Facilities Support Services · New York

Sodexo at Hobart College-Housekeeping

Geneva, NY · ~61 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.0
Avg TCR
2.6
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Sodexo at Hobart College-Housekeeping runs at 37% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Facilities Support Services workplace, earning a grade A.

Sodexo at Hobart College-Housekeeping: 1.0 TCR = 37% of Facilities Support Services BLS 2.6 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Sodexo at Hobart College-Housekeeping safety composite

Sodexo at Hobart College-Housekeeping scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 85% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 26%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

56/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 0.97 per 100 workers

Safer than 85% of industry peers

DART rate
F 2.92 per 100 workers

Safer than 26% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Sodexo at Hobart College-Housekeeping: 0.0 → 2.9 TCR

Peak year 2021 @ 2.9 TCR · DART/TCR 3.01× in 2021

Sodexo at Hobart College-Housekeeping's TCR rose 2.9 from 0.0 in 2018 to 2.9 in 2021. In 2021, DART was 3.01× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 561210 · Geneva, NY AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 1.0 · 37% of ind

  • DART 2.9 DART
  • RANK #6/36
  • PHOTO SODEXO AT TROY UNIVE…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~61 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: SODEXO AT TROY UNIVERSITY FM (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New York employers → · Look up another →

Sodexo at Hobart College-Housekeeping in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Sodexo at Hobart College-Housekeeping averages 1.0 TCR (37% of the Facilities Support Services BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Sodexo at Hobart College-Housekeeping TCR series: 2018=0 · 2019=0 · 2021=2.9 · BLS 2.6

Where Sodexo at Hobart College-Housekeeping falls in its industry

757 Facilities Support Services establishments

Safer than 85% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New York alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #6 safest of 36 Facilities Support Services employers in New York.

Sodexo at Hobart College-Housekeeping (61 employees, TCR 1.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Sodexo at Hobart College-Housekeeping
Sodexo at Hobart College-Housekeeping (61 employees, TCR 1.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.9

Sodexo at Hobart College-Housekeeping has more employees than the Facilities Support Services median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 2.9 2.9 2 1 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

561210 · NY · Geneva

757 Facilities Support Services employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 21,008 rated employers in New York with headcount on file · 49 employers in Geneva, NY · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR SODEXO AT TROY UNIVERSITY FM 1.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR MPW Industrial Services, Inc. - Kenworth 1.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR MPW Industrial Services, Inc. - Toyota Georgetown 1.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR SODEXO AT COLLEGE OF DUPAGE 1.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE W. 42nd Street Substation 61 FTE
STATE-SIZE Apex Building Company 61 FTE
STATE-SIZE Lehigh Construction Group, Inc. 61 FTE
STATE-SIZE Oriskany Falls Construction 61 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hobart and William Smith Colleges 2,005 FTE
CITY-NEAR Geneva General Hospital 798 FTE
CITY-NEAR Zotos International Inc. 603 FTE
CITY-NEAR Henkel US Operations Corporation 411 FTE
NAT-TCR Knoxville/Lenoir City Terminal - NON DOT 1.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Indianapolis Terminal - NON DOT 1.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Buckley Newspapers Inc. 1.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Instrumentation : Huntsville 1.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Sodexo at Washington Community - Food 61 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sodexo at Forest Grove- Facilities 61 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sodexo at Yukon Sd Food & Nutrition 61 FTE
NAT-SIZE Asphalt Producers, LLC 61 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.