Commercial and industrial machinery repair and maintenance services · Minnesota

Industrial Cleaning

Hibbing, MN · ~78 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
1.9
Avg TCR
2.1
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Industrial Cleaning runs at 88% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Commercial and industrial machinery repair and maintenance services workplace, earning a grade C.

Industrial Cleaning: 1.9 TCR = 88% of Commercial and industrial machinery repair and maintenance services BLS 2.1 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Industrial Cleaning safety composite

Industrial Cleaning scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 66% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 41%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

54/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 1.85 per 100 workers

Safer than 66% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.4 per 100 workers

Safer than 41% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Industrial Cleaning held a steady TCR band

Industrial Cleaning's TCR held near 0.2 from 1.6 in 2017 to 1.4 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2018 at 2.7 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0.76× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=1.6 · 2018=2.7 · 2019=2.5 · 2020=1.5 · 2021=1.4 · 2022=1.4

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 811310 · Hibbing, MN AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 1.9 · 88% of ind

  • DART 1.4 DART
  • RANK #16/56
  • PHOTO STS Operating - Savage
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 7 inj
  • SIZE ~78 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: STS Operating - Savage (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Industrial Cleaning in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Industrial Cleaning averages 1.9 TCR (88% of the Commercial and industrial machinery repair and maintenance services BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Industrial Cleaning TCR series: 2017=1.6 · 2018=2.7 · 2019=2.5 · 2020=1.5 · 2021=1.4 · 2022=1.4 · BLS 2.1

Where Industrial Cleaning falls in its industry

2,560 Commercial and industrial mach establishments

Safer than 66% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #16 safest of 56 Commercial and industrial mach employers in Minnesota.

Industrial Cleaning (78 employees, TCR 1.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 2.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Industrial Cleaning
Industrial Cleaning (78 employees, TCR 1.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 2.7

Industrial Cleaning has more employees than the Commercial and industrial machinery repa median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 1.4 1.4 1 0 0
2021 1.4 0.0 1 0 0
2020 1.5 1.5 1 0 0
2019 2.5 1.2 1 1 0
2018 2.7 0.0 2 0 0
2017 1.6 1.6 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

811310 · MN · Hibbing

2,560 Commercial and industrial machinery repair and maintenance services employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 53 employers in Hibbing, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR STS Operating - Savage 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR 104668 - Seattle Marine Yard 2021 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR STERIS IMS Lenexa 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Ryder Highland Park 1.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Austin Utilities 78 FTE
STATE-SIZE Highline Construction, Inc. 78 FTE
STATE-SIZE Wireless - Wanamingo, MN 78 FTE
STATE-SIZE Prestige Drywall inc. 78 FTE
CITY-NEAR FV - Range Medical Center 811 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 2937 247 FTE
CITY-NEAR L&M Radiator 246 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2937 237 FTE
NAT-TCR Crimson Trace 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Midwest STIHL 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR International Transportation Services Inc. 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Zyklus Heat Transfer, Inc. 1.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE LET 78 FTE
NAT-SIZE Macon Valley Nursing & Rehabilitation Center 78 FTE
NAT-SIZE Waukegan Station 78 FTE
NAT-SIZE K-Line Industries, Inc. 78 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.