Industrial equipment and machinery repair and maintenance services · Minnesota

STS Operating - Savage

Savage, MN · ~103 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
1.9
Avg TCR
2.1
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

STS Operating - Savage runs at 88% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Industrial equipment and machinery repair and maintenance services workplace, earning a grade C.

STS Operating - Savage: 1.9 TCR = 88% of Industrial equipment and machinery repair and maintenance services BLS 2.1 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

STS Operating - Savage safety composite

STS Operating - Savage scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 66% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 45%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

55/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 1.85 per 100 workers

Safer than 66% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.1 per 100 workers

Safer than 45% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.7

2017→2024

STS Operating - Savage injury rate improved

STS Operating - Savage's TCR fell 0.7 from 1.8 in 2017 to 1.1 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 3.4 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.59× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=1.8 · 2018=0.9 · 2019=0.9 · 2020=3.4 · 2021=3.0 · 2022=1.7 · 2023=2.0 · 2024=1.1

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 811310 · Savage, MN AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 1.9 · 88% of ind

  • DART 1.1 DART
  • RANK #15/56
  • PHOTO 104668 - Seattle Mar…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 13 inj
  • SIZE ~103 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 104668 - Seattle Marine Yard 2021 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

STS Operating - Savage in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows STS Operating - Savage averages 1.9 TCR (88% of the Industrial equipment and machinery repair and maintenance services BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

STS Operating - Savage TCR series: 2017=1.8 · 2018=0.9 · 2019=0.9 · 2020=3.4 · 2021=3 · 2022=1.7 · 2023=2 · 2024=1.1 · BLS 2.1

Where STS Operating - Savage falls in its industry

2,560 Industrial equipment and machi establishments

Safer than 66% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #15 safest of 56 Industrial equipment and machi employers in Minnesota.

STS Operating - Savage (103 employees, TCR 1.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 2.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate STS Operating - Savage
STS Operating - Savage (103 employees, TCR 1.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 2.7

STS Operating - Savage has more employees than the Industrial equipment and machinery repai median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.1 1.1 1 0 0
2023 2.0 1.0 2 0 0
2022 1.7 0.0 0 1 0
2021 3.0 0.0 3 0 0
2020 3.4 0.0 4 0 0
2019 0.9 0.0 1 0 0
2018 0.9 0.0 0 1 0
2017 1.8 0.0 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

811310 · MN · Savage

2,560 Industrial equipment and machinery repair and maintenance services employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 63 employers in Savage, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 104668 - Seattle Marine Yard 2021 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR STERIS IMS Lenexa 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Ryder Highland Park 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Industrial Cleaning 1.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Ulland Brothers, Inc. 103 FTE
STATE-SIZE AVAOP, LLC 103 FTE
STATE-SIZE MGK-HQ 103 FTE
STATE-SIZE Twin City EDM 103 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1833 - Savage 357 FTE
CITY-NEAR Savage - Main Store 294 FTE
CITY-NEAR MN Plant 243 FTE
CITY-NEAR City of Savage 180 FTE
NAT-TCR ICC Hermitage 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Waynesboro 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Advanced Thermal Systems, Inc. 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR O'Neal Excavating and Construction Inc 1.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Weatherford 103 FTE
NAT-SIZE Load Rite Trailers, LLC 103 FTE
NAT-SIZE Corona 103 FTE
NAT-SIZE Anaheim Hills 103 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.