Jewelry, precious metal, manufacturing · California

Industrial Strength Corporation

Carlsbad, CA · ~69 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.2
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Industrial Strength Corporation runs at 66% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Jewelry, precious metal, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade B.

Industrial Strength Corporation: 2.2 TCR = 66% of Jewelry, precious metal, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Industrial Strength Corporation safety composite

Industrial Strength Corporation scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 79% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 38%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

56/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 2.18 per 100 workers

Safer than 38% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 79% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Industrial Strength Corporation held a steady TCR band

Industrial Strength Corporation's TCR held near 0.1 from 1.4 in 2018 to 1.3 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 5.5 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=1.4 · 2019=2.7 · 2020=1.7 · 2021=5.5 · 2022=2.7 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=1.3

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 339910 · Carlsbad, CA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 2.2 · 66% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #5/6
  • PHOTO KCC
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 11 inj
  • SIZE ~69 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: KCC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Industrial Strength Corporation in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Industrial Strength Corporation averages 2.2 TCR (66% of the Jewelry, precious metal, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Industrial Strength Corporation TCR series: 2018=1.4 · 2019=2.7 · 2020=1.7 · 2021=5.5 · 2022=2.7 · 2023=0 · 2024=1.3 · BLS 3.3

Where Industrial Strength Corporation falls in its industry

68 Jewelry, precious metal, manuf establishments

Safer than 38% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #5 safest of 6 Jewelry, precious metal, manuf employers in California.

Industrial Strength Corporation (69 employees, TCR 2.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 75 employees and a TCR of 2.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Industrial Strength Corporation
Industrial Strength Corporation (69 employees, TCR 2.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 75 employees and a TCR of 2.0

Industrial Strength Corporation has fewer employees than the Jewelry, precious metal, manufacturing median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.3 0.0 1 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 2.7 1.3 2 0 0
2021 5.5 1.4 4 0 0
2020 1.7 1.7 1 0 0
2019 2.7 2.7 2 0 0
2018 1.4 1.4 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

339910 · CA · Carlsbad

68 Jewelry, precious metal, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 218 employers in Carlsbad, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR KCC 2.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Jostens - Denton 2.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR JCN FORM 300A ITA Submittal 2.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Lee's Morvillo Group 2.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Woolf Enterprises 69 FTE
STATE-SIZE Terranova Ranch, Inc 69 FTE
STATE-SIZE Rayo Shop 69 FTE
STATE-SIZE Sun Pacific Harvesting | Citrus Harvesting 69 FTE
CITY-NEAR Thermo Fisher Scientific 2,234 FTE
CITY-NEAR Legoland California Resort 2,055 FTE
CITY-NEAR Bergelectric Corp. CA 1,520 FTE
CITY-NEAR Life Sciences Solutions Group (LSG) Remote Employees 1,350 FTE
NAT-TCR Quikserv Inc. 2.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Spring Valley 2.2 TCR
NAT-TCR DPR Construction - Maryland 2.2 TCR
NAT-TCR All-Tag Corporation 2.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE City of Madisonville - Police 69 FTE
NAT-SIZE Pyrotek Spokane West 69 FTE
NAT-SIZE RJR Technologies Phoenix Facility 69 FTE
NAT-SIZE Brooks-Berry-Haynie & Associates NC 69 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.