Executive and legislative office combinations · North Carolina

Infrastructure & Asset Management

Concord, NC · ~82 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
6.2
Avg TCR
3.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Infrastructure & Asset Management runs at 194% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Executive and legislative office combinations workplace, earning a grade D.

Infrastructure & Asset Management: 6.2 TCR = 194% of Executive and legislative office combinations BLS 3.2 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Infrastructure & Asset Management safety composite

Infrastructure & Asset Management scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 55% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 34%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

40/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 6.22 per 100 workers

Safer than 34% of industry peers

DART rate
D 3.02 per 100 workers

Safer than 36% of industry peers

Fatalities
C 0

Safer than 55% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.8

2018→2024

Infrastructure & Asset Management injury rate improved

Infrastructure & Asset Management's TCR fell 0.8 from 4.8 in 2018 to 4.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 10.1 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.49× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=4.8 · 2019=8.0 · 2020=3.9 · 2021=7.8 · 2022=10.1 · 2023=4.9 · 2024=4.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 921140 · Concord, NC ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 6.2 · 194% of ind

  • DART 3.0 DART
  • RANK #24/34
  • PHOTO City of Cottonwood
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 31 inj
  • SIZE ~82 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: City of Cottonwood (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Infrastructure & Asset Management in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Infrastructure & Asset Management averages 6.2 TCR (194% of the Executive and legislative office combinations BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Infrastructure & Asset Management TCR series: 2018=4.8 · 2019=8 · 2020=3.9 · 2021=7.8 · 2022=10.1 · 2023=4.9 · 2024=4 · BLS 3.2

Where Infrastructure & Asset Management falls in its industry

239 Executive and legislative offi establishments

Safer than 34% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #24 safest of 34 Executive and legislative offi employers in North Carolina.

Infrastructure & Asset Management (82 employees, TCR 6.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 282 employees and a TCR of 4.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Infrastructure & Asset Management
Infrastructure & Asset Management (82 employees, TCR 6.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 282 employees and a TCR of 4.8

Infrastructure & Asset Management has fewer employees than the Executive and legislative office combina median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 4.0 3.0 4 0 0
2023 4.9 3.9 5 0 0
2022 10.1 4.3 7 0 0
2021 7.8 7.8 4 2 0
2020 3.9 2.6 2 1 0
2019 8.0 4.0 6 0 0
2018 4.8 4.8 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

921140 · NC · Concord

239 Executive and legislative office combinations employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 338 employers in Concord, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR City of Cottonwood 6.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR CITY OF EAGLE LAKE 6.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR FIRE ACADEMY 6.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Cedar County 6.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Robert & Wade Glover Farms Inc. 82 FTE
STATE-SIZE SouthEnd Exteriors 82 FTE
STATE-SIZE CT Wilson Construction Company 82 FTE
STATE-SIZE JAMES L CAYTON ACCOCIATES INC 82 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1114-Atrium Health Cabarrus (1114) 3,087 FTE
CITY-NEAR 0070-CHS NorthEast 2,949 FTE
CITY-NEAR 0070-Atrium Health Cabarrus 2,870 FTE
CITY-NEAR North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : CLT3 1,263 FTE
NAT-TCR Material Sampling Technologies 6.2 TCR
NAT-TCR SCC010 6.2 TCR
NAT-TCR COD028 6.2 TCR
NAT-TCR CAL046 6.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Concord's Colonial Inn 82 FTE
NAT-SIZE Vande Hey Company, Inc. 82 FTE
NAT-SIZE Pariseault Builders Inc. 82 FTE
NAT-SIZE Crown Lift Trucks Sacramento 82 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.