Coating metals and metal products for the trade · California

Inland Powder Coating Corp

Ontario, CA · ~72 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
15.7
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Inland Powder Coating Corp runs at 474% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Coating metals and metal products for the trade workplace, earning a grade F.

Inland Powder Coating Corp: 15.7 TCR = 474% of Coating metals and metal products for the trade BLS 3.3 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Inland Powder Coating Corp safety composite

Inland Powder Coating Corp scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 52% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 4%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

33/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 15.65 per 100 workers

Safer than 4% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.48 per 100 workers

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−21.4

2017→2024

Inland Powder Coating Corp injury rate improved

Inland Powder Coating Corp's TCR fell 21.4 from 27.4 in 2017 to 5.9 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2017 at 27.4 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.09× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=27.4 · 2018=12.4 · 2020=23.3 · 2022=12.7 · 2023=12.3 · 2024=5.9

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332812 · Ontario, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 15.7 · 474% of ind

  • DART 1.5 DART
  • RANK #28/29
  • PHOTO Big Bend Galvanizing
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 75 inj
  • SIZE ~72 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Big Bend Galvanizing (0.2 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Inland Powder Coating Corp in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Inland Powder Coating Corp averages 15.7 TCR (474% of the Coating metals and metal products for the trade BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Inland Powder Coating Corp TCR series: 2017=27.4 · 2018=12.4 · 2020=23.3 · 2022=12.7 · 2023=12.3 · 2024=5.9 · BLS 3.3

Where Inland Powder Coating Corp falls in its industry

646 Coating metals and metal produ establishments

Safer than 4% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #28 safest of 29 Coating metals and metal produ employers in California.

Inland Powder Coating Corp (72 employees, TCR 15.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 58 employees and a TCR of 3.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Inland Powder Coating Corp
Inland Powder Coating Corp (72 employees, TCR 15.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 58 employees and a TCR of 3.9

Inland Powder Coating Corp has more employees than the Coating metals and metal products for th median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 5.9 1.5 4 0 0
2023 12.3 12.3 10 0 0
2022 12.7 12.7 9 0 0
2020 23.3 23.3 13 0 0
2018 12.4 10.2 11 0 0
2017 27.4 21.5 28 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332812 · CA · Ontario

646 Coating metals and metal products for the trade employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 599 employers in Ontario, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Big Bend Galvanizing 15.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Tennessee Galvanizing, Inc. 15.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Clad-rex, LLC 15.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR ReinCoat, LLC 15.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Monterey Pacific, LLC 72 FTE
STATE-SIZE Arts Ranch 72 FTE
STATE-SIZE Mellano & Company - Los Angeles Wholesale House 72 FTE
STATE-SIZE Greg Hooker dba Diamond H Dairy 72 FTE
CITY-NEAR Prime Healthcare Services Inc. Location: St. Mary's, Passaic LLC 46-3499370 (HP29) 10,997 FTE
CITY-NEAR CAONA - ONTARIO HUB 4,372 FTE
CITY-NEAR ONTARIO HUB (CAONA) 3,354 FTE
CITY-NEAR Atlantic Solutions Group Inc, Inc. DBA Empire Workforce Solutions 3,240 FTE
NAT-TCR Gilbert AZ DI 15.7 TCR
NAT-TCR 1547 Medford Twp SD 15.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Holiday Trucking LLC 15.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Neall - Alliance 15.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE RK Energy, LLC 72 FTE
NAT-SIZE Palmer Bus Service of New London-Spicer, Inc. 72 FTE
NAT-SIZE Greenbriar Nursing and Rehabilitation Center 72 FTE
NAT-SIZE 1542 Canon City 72 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2020, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.