Locks (except coin-operated, time locks), metal, manufacturing · Massachusetts

Inner-Tite Corp.

Holden, MA · ~77 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
5.3
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Inner-Tite Corp. runs at 160% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Locks (except coin-operated, time locks), metal, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade D.

Inner-Tite Corp.: 5.3 TCR = 160% of Locks (except coin-operated, time locks), metal, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Inner-Tite Corp. safety composite

Inner-Tite Corp. scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 84% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 24%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

52/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 5.28 per 100 workers

Safer than 24% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 84% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−6.1

2016→2024

Inner-Tite Corp. injury rate improved

Inner-Tite Corp.'s TCR fell 6.1 from 7.3 in 2016 to 1.2 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 16.0 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=7.3 · 2017=2.6 · 2018=4.2 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=9.8 · 2021=16.0 · 2022=1.4 · 2023=5.0 · 2024=1.2

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332510 · Holden, MA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 5.3 · 160% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #4/7
  • PHOTO GG Schmitt & Sons, I…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 18 inj
  • SIZE ~77 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: GG Schmitt & Sons, Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Massachusetts employers → · Look up another →

Inner-Tite Corp. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Inner-Tite Corp. averages 5.3 TCR (160% of the Locks (except coin-operated, time locks), metal, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Inner-Tite Corp. TCR series: 2016=7.3 · 2017=2.6 · 2018=4.2 · 2019=0 · 2020=9.8 · 2021=16 · 2022=1.4 · 2023=5 · 2024=1.2 · BLS 3.3

Where Inner-Tite Corp. falls in its industry

189 Locks (except coin-operated, t establishments

Safer than 24% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Massachusetts alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #4 safest of 7 Locks (except coin-operated, t employers in Massachusetts.

Inner-Tite Corp. (77 employees, TCR 5.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 82 employees and a TCR of 3.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Inner-Tite Corp.
Inner-Tite Corp. (77 employees, TCR 5.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 82 employees and a TCR of 3.4

Inner-Tite Corp. has fewer employees than the Locks (except coin-operated, time locks) median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.2 0.0 1 0 0
2023 5.0 1.3 4 0 0
2022 1.4 1.4 1 0 0
2021 16.0 8.7 1 10 0
2020 9.8 4.2 4 3 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 4.2 2.8 2 1 0
2017 2.6 0.0 1 1 0
2016 7.3 0.0 4 2 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332510 · MA · Holden

189 Locks (except coin-operated, time locks), metal, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,108 rated employers in Massachusetts with headcount on file · 13 employers in Holden, MA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR GG Schmitt & Sons, Inc. 5.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Garelick Largo 5.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Corbin Russwin 5.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR National Products, Inc.- Die Cast 5.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE The Richmond Group Main Office 77 FTE
STATE-SIZE Chapman Construction/Design 77 FTE
STATE-SIZE G.V.W., Inc. 77 FTE
STATE-SIZE 5001 - Avon, MA 77 FTE
CITY-NEAR Holden Rehabilitation & Skilled Nursing Center 212 FTE
CITY-NEAR Big Y Foods, Inc. Holden 135 FTE
CITY-NEAR Pepsi Cola Bottling Company of Worcester, Inc. 113 FTE
CITY-NEAR Holden MB 102 FTE
NAT-TCR Berry Material Handling - Topeka 5.3 TCR
NAT-TCR 007-RUIDOSO 5.3 TCR
NAT-TCR 1049 - Glen Allen Broad St 5.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Package Pavement Company, Inc. 5.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Huron Woods Nursing Center 77 FTE
NAT-SIZE Banko Beverage Co. 77 FTE
NAT-SIZE EFCO dba Ajax/CECO/Erie Press 77 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ohio Bridge Manufacturing 77 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.