Urethane foam products manufacturing · Indiana

Innocor Foam Technologies - ACP, Inc. - Elkhart Pour

Elkhart, IN · ~56 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.2
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Innocor Foam Technologies - ACP, Inc. - Elkhart Pour runs at 36% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Urethane foam products manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Innocor Foam Technologies - ACP, Inc. - Elkhart Pour: 1.2 TCR = 36% of Urethane foam products manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Innocor Foam Technologies - ACP, Inc. - Elkhart Pour safety composite

Innocor Foam Technologies - ACP, Inc. - Elkhart Pour scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 87% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

76/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.19 per 100 workers

Safer than 87% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 82% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.0

2017→2019

Innocor Foam Technologies - ACP, Inc. - Elkhart Pour injury rate improved

Innocor Foam Technologies - ACP, Inc. - Elkhart Pour's TCR fell 3.0 from 3.0 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2019. Peak filing year was 2017 at 3.0 TCR. In 2019, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=3.0 · 2018=0.6 · 2019=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 326150 · Elkhart, IN AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 1.2 · 36% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #5/37
  • PHOTO Taylor Plant
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~56 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Taylor Plant (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Indiana employers → · Look up another →

Innocor Foam Technologies - ACP, Inc. - Elkhart Pour in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Innocor Foam Technologies - ACP, Inc. - Elkhart Pour averages 1.2 TCR (36% of the Urethane foam products manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Innocor Foam Technologies - ACP, Inc. - Elkhart Pour TCR series: 2017=3 · 2018=0.6 · 2019=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Innocor Foam Technologies - ACP, Inc. - Elkhart Pour falls in its industry

474 Urethane foam products manufac establishments

Safer than 87% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Indiana alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #5 safest of 37 Urethane foam products manufac employers in Indiana.

Innocor Foam Technologies - ACP, Inc. - Elkhart Pour (56 employees, TCR 1.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 76 employees and a TCR of 3.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Innocor Foam Technologies - ACP, Inc. - Elkhart Pour
Innocor Foam Technologies - ACP, Inc. - Elkhart Pour (56 employees, TCR 1.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 76 employees and a TCR of 3.1

Innocor Foam Technologies - ACP, Inc. - Elkhart Pour has fewer employees than the Urethane foam products manufacturing median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.6 0.0 1 0 0
2017 3.0 0.0 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

326150 · IN · Elkhart

474 Urethane foam products manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,750 rated employers in Indiana with headcount on file · 401 employers in Elkhart, IN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Taylor Plant 1.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR UFP Technologies-El Paso 1.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Schul - Willseal - Tremco 1.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR FXI, Inc. - Miami 1.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Sanitary District - Water Reclamation Department 56 FTE
STATE-SIZE Steam Division 56 FTE
STATE-SIZE CME Corporation 56 FTE
STATE-SIZE Fort Wayne 30 56 FTE
CITY-NEAR Forest River, Inc. 12,549 FTE
CITY-NEAR THOR MOTOR COACH 2,437 FTE
CITY-NEAR Elkhart Community Schools 1,892 FTE
CITY-NEAR HRV LLC 1,692 FTE
NAT-TCR Foveon Inc 541712 1.2 TCR
NAT-TCR SumCo Eco-Contracting, LLC 1.2 TCR
NAT-TCR KIT Zeller Rochester 1.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Pacific Power Generation - Ridgefield 1.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Willowbrook Rehabilitation & Care Center 56 FTE
NAT-SIZE MILLENNIUM Metals 56 FTE
NAT-SIZE Southview - Inverwood Senior Living 56 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sentinel Printing 56 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.