Displays (e.g., counter, floor, point-of-purchase) manufacturing · Ohio

Innomark Communications, LLC

Fairfield, OH · ~379 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.1
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Innomark Communications, LLC runs at 33% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Displays (e.g., counter, floor, point-of-purchase) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Innomark Communications, LLC: 1.1 TCR = 33% of Displays (e.g., counter, floor, point-of-purchase) manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Innomark Communications, LLC safety composite

Innomark Communications, LLC scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 90% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

68/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 1.1 per 100 workers

Safer than 90% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0.43 per 100 workers

Safer than 57% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Innomark Communications, LLC held a steady TCR band

Innomark Communications, LLC's TCR held near 0.0 from 1.3 in 2016 to 1.3 in 2020. Peak filing year was 2016 at 1.3 TCR. In 2020, DART was 0.39× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=1.3 · 2017=1.2 · 2018=1.3 · 2019=0.4 · 2020=1.3

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 339950 · Fairfield, OH AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 1.1 · 33% of ind

  • DART 0.4 DART
  • RANK #3/22
  • PHOTO Columbus Sign Company
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 25 inj
  • SIZE ~379 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Columbus Sign Company (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Ohio employers → · Look up another →

Innomark Communications, LLC in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Innomark Communications, LLC averages 1.1 TCR (33% of the Displays (e.g., counter, floor, point-of-purchase) manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Innomark Communications, LLC TCR series: 2016=1.3 · 2017=1.2 · 2018=1.3 · 2019=0.4 · 2020=1.3 · BLS 3.3

Where Innomark Communications, LLC falls in its industry

405 Displays (e.g., counter, floor establishments

Safer than 90% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Ohio alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #3 safest of 22 Displays (e.g., counter, floor employers in Ohio.

Innomark Communications, LLC (379 employees, TCR 1.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 53 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Innomark Communications, LLC
Innomark Communications, LLC (379 employees, TCR 1.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 53 employees and a TCR of 3.5

Innomark Communications, LLC has more employees than the Displays (e.g., counter, floor, point-of median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 1.3 0.4 6 0 0
2019 0.4 0.4 2 0 0
2018 1.3 0.4 6 0 0
2017 1.2 0.2 5 0 0
2016 1.3 0.2 6 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

339950 · OH · Fairfield

405 Displays (e.g., counter, floor, point-of-purchase) manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,650 rated employers in Ohio with headcount on file · 148 employers in Fairfield, OH · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Columbus Sign Company 1.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Lee Designs llc 1.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Jones Sign 1.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Czarnowski-Chicago 1.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE NA Svc ERS 379 FTE
STATE-SIZE Defense and Systems Vandalia OH 379 FTE
STATE-SIZE Federal-Mogul Powertrain LLC 379 FTE
STATE-SIZE Sygma Columbus 379 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mercy Health Fairfield Hospital 1,575 FTE
CITY-NEAR Fairfield Hospital 1,513 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mercy Hospital Fairfield 1,494 FTE
CITY-NEAR Koch Foods 1,275 FTE
NAT-TCR USA Compression Partners - Treating Operations 1.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Yamada Paint Contracting, Inc. dba GW Construction 1.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Store 0060 SMITHFIELD 1.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Houston Main Office 1.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Rydal Park 379 FTE
NAT-SIZE Austin TEA 379 FTE
NAT-SIZE CCNA-Paw Paw 379 FTE
NAT-SIZE A Beka Book, Inc. 379 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.