Soybean farming, field and seed production · Wisconsin

Insight FS - Jefferson

Jefferson, WI · ~63 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
3.0
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Insight FS - Jefferson runs at 66% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Soybean farming, field and seed production workplace, earning a grade B.

Insight FS - Jefferson: 3.0 TCR = 66% of Soybean farming, field and seed production BLS 4.5 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Insight FS - Jefferson safety composite

Insight FS - Jefferson scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 82% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

67/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 2.95 per 100 workers

Safer than 82% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 62% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.7

2016→2024

Insight FS - Jefferson injury rate improved

Insight FS - Jefferson's TCR fell 2.7 from 4.1 in 2016 to 1.4 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2019 at 7.2 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=4.1 · 2018=2.3 · 2019=7.2 · 2020=2.5 · 2021=2.4 · 2022=1.2 · 2023=2.4 · 2024=1.4

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 111110 · Jefferson, WI AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 3.0 · 66% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #2/4
  • PHOTO Pacific Tomato Growe…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 18 inj
  • SIZE ~63 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Pacific Tomato Growers, Ltd - Newport TN Farm (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Wisconsin employers → · Look up another →

Insight FS - Jefferson in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Insight FS - Jefferson averages 3.0 TCR (66% of the Soybean farming, field and seed production BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Insight FS - Jefferson TCR series: 2016=4.1 · 2018=2.3 · 2019=7.2 · 2020=2.5 · 2021=2.4 · 2022=1.2 · 2023=2.4 · 2024=1.4 · BLS 4.5

Where Insight FS - Jefferson falls in its industry

17 Soybean farming, field and see establishments

Safer than 82% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Wisconsin alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #2 safest of 4 Soybean farming, field and see employers in Wisconsin.

Insight FS - Jefferson (63 employees, TCR 3.0) among 9 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 50 employees and a TCR of 4.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 10 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250300 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate GDM Seeds, Inc - Gibson City, ILJack Bros., Inc.ViafieldGDM Seeds, IncPacific Tomato Growers, Ltd - Newport TN FarmAgri-Tech/GrainInsight FS - AntigoFischer SeedsHuntsinger Farms, Inc.Insight FS - Jefferson
Insight FS - Jefferson (63 employees, TCR 3.0) among 9 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 50 employees and a TCR of 4.9

Insight FS - Jefferson has more employees than the Soybean farming, field and seed producti median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.4 0.0 1 0 0
2023 2.4 2.4 2 0 0
2022 1.2 1.2 1 0 0
2021 2.4 1.2 2 0 0
2020 2.5 0.0 2 0 0
2019 7.2 6.0 5 1 0
2018 2.3 2.3 2 0 0
2016 4.1 2.8 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

111110 · WI · Jefferson

17 Soybean farming, field and seed production employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,834 rated employers in Wisconsin with headcount on file · 18 employers in Jefferson, WI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Pacific Tomato Growers, Ltd - Newport TN Farm 2.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Jack Bros., Inc. 3.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Insight FS - Antigo 2.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR STEYER SEEDS LLC 4.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Miltrim Farms Inc. 63 FTE
STATE-SIZE Barron Live Haul 63 FTE
STATE-SIZE Clifford A Chier Resource Center 63 FTE
STATE-SIZE J.H. Hassinger,Inc. 63 FTE
CITY-NEAR Generac Power Systems Inc. 362 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 3499 284 FTE
CITY-NEAR Nestle Purina Pet Care - Jefferson 248 FTE
CITY-NEAR 3499 243 FTE
NAT-TCR Precision Associates, Inc. 3.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Calibrated Forms 3.0 TCR
NAT-TCR PMX Industries, Inc. 3.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Columbia Falls MDF 3.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Johnson County REMC 63 FTE
NAT-SIZE 560 - Dump - Chicago 63 FTE
NAT-SIZE Pineknoll Rehabilitation Centre 63 FTE
NAT-SIZE DPL-Centreville 63 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.