Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities · Arizona

Inspira Arrowhead Senior Living

Scottsdale, AZ · ~132 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
18.9
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Inspira Arrowhead Senior Living runs at 496% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Inspira Arrowhead Senior Living: 18.9 TCR = 496% of Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities BLS 3.8 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Inspira Arrowhead Senior Living safety composite

Inspira Arrowhead Senior Living scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 4%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

17/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 18.85 per 100 workers

Safer than 6% of industry peers

DART rate
F 21.04 per 100 workers

Safer than 4% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Inspira Arrowhead Senior Living: 7.1 → 27.7 TCR

Peak year 2022 @ 27.7 TCR · DART/TCR 1.12× in 2022

Inspira Arrowhead Senior Living's TCR rose 20.5 from 7.1 in 2020 to 27.7 in 2022. In 2022, DART was 1.12× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623311 · Scottsdale, AZ ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 18.9 · 496% of ind

  • DART 21.0 DART
  • RANK #100/109
  • PHOTO Silverado Beverly Pl…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 22 inj
  • SIZE ~132 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Silverado Beverly Place - 215 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Arizona employers → · Look up another →

Inspira Arrowhead Senior Living in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Inspira Arrowhead Senior Living averages 18.9 TCR (496% of the Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Inspira Arrowhead Senior Living TCR series: 2020=7.1 · 2021=21.7 · 2022=27.7 · BLS 3.8

Where Inspira Arrowhead Senior Living falls in its industry

4,127 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 6% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Arizona alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #100 safest of 109 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Arizona.

Inspira Arrowhead Senior Living (132 employees, TCR 18.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Inspira Arrowhead Senior Living
Inspira Arrowhead Senior Living (132 employees, TCR 18.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9

Inspira Arrowhead Senior Living has more employees than the Assisted-living facilities with on-site median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 27.7 21.0 7 18 0
2021 21.7 9.5 11 5 0
2020 7.1 7.1 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623311 · AZ · Scottsdale

4,127 Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 9,594 rated employers in Arizona with headcount on file · 531 employers in Scottsdale, AZ · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Silverado Beverly Place - 215 18.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Green Ridge Village 18.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Citadel Estates- Hazel Crest 18.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Barrington Terrace of Fort Myers 18.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE M754-M001 132 FTE
STATE-SIZE MiTek Inc. (Tolleson West) 132 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hydro - Phoenix Fab Center 132 FTE
STATE-SIZE Crane Aerospace & Electronics - Chandler 132 FTE
CITY-NEAR Educational Services LLC 6,575 FTE
CITY-NEAR City of Scottsdale 4,077 FTE
CITY-NEAR SHEA MEDICAL CTR CAMPUS 2,881 FTE
CITY-NEAR SUPPORT SERVICES CAMPUS 2,800 FTE
NAT-TCR Emergency Medical Services 18.9 TCR
NAT-TCR 1002 Batesville Retail 18.9 TCR
NAT-TCR 6400-SWY-0005-0005-02555 18.9 TCR
NAT-TCR La Amistad Foundation, Inc. 18.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE City of Wood River 132 FTE
NAT-SIZE West Flo 132 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ridgeview Le Sueur Medical Center 132 FTE
NAT-SIZE King Electrical Mfg Co. 132 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.