Insulation contractors · Oregon

Installed Building Products Portland #880

Portland, OR · ~37 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
10.8
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Installed Building Products Portland #880 runs at 386% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Insulation contractors workplace, earning a grade F.

Installed Building Products Portland #880: 10.8 TCR = 386% of Insulation contractors BLS 2.8 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Installed Building Products Portland #880 safety composite

Installed Building Products Portland #880 scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 6%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

18/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 10.82 per 100 workers

Safer than 7% of industry peers

DART rate
F 10.34 per 100 workers

Safer than 6% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Installed Building Products Portland #880: 5.3 → 12.4 TCR

Peak year 2020 @ 13.7 TCR · DART/TCR 0.96× in 2021

Installed Building Products Portland #880's TCR rose 7.1 from 5.3 in 2018 to 12.4 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2020 at 13.7 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0.96× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238310 · Portland, OR ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 10.8 · 386% of ind

  • DART 10.3 DART
  • RANK #25/33
  • PHOTO MIG Building Systems…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 19 inj
  • SIZE ~37 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: MIG Building Systems #357 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Oregon employers → · Look up another →

Installed Building Products Portland #880 in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Installed Building Products Portland #880 averages 10.8 TCR (386% of the Insulation contractors BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Installed Building Products Portland #880 TCR series: 2018=5.3 · 2019=11.9 · 2020=13.7 · 2021=12.4 · BLS 2.8

Where Installed Building Products Portland #880 falls in its industry

1,613 Insulation contractors establishments

Safer than 7% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Oregon alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #25 safest of 33 Insulation contractors employers in Oregon.

Installed Building Products Portland #880 (37 employees, TCR 10.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 63 employees and a TCR of 3.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Installed Building Products Portland #880
Installed Building Products Portland #880 (37 employees, TCR 10.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 63 employees and a TCR of 3.4

Installed Building Products Portland #880 has fewer employees than the Insulation contractors median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 12.4 10.3 6 0 0
2020 13.7 9.1 6 0 0
2019 11.9 11.9 5 0 0
2018 5.3 5.3 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238310 · OR · Portland

1,613 Insulation contractors employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 8,031 rated employers in Oregon with headcount on file · 1,728 employers in Portland, OR · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR MIG Building Systems #357 10.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR JBS Plastering, Inc 10.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR USI Savannah 10.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Wiljo Interiors 10.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE BIZON NURSERY LLC 37 FTE
STATE-SIZE SNOW PEAK AREA 37 FTE
STATE-SIZE OR-Eugene RC 37 FTE
STATE-SIZE OR-Parkrose RC 37 FTE
CITY-NEAR OHSU Main Campus 18,003 FTE
CITY-NEAR OR349 PROVIDENCE ST VINCENT MEDICAL CTR-PORTLA 4,033 FTE
CITY-NEAR OR346 PROVIDENCE PORTLAND MEDICAL CTR-PORTLAND 3,684 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2252-00000530 3,498 FTE
NAT-TCR Arbor - Des Plaines Ccsd 62 10.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Laird Hospital 10.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Prospect EOGH Inc. 10.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Tulare Warehouse - Langston Companies Inc. 10.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Marv's Insulation #883 37 FTE
NAT-SIZE Columbia Shelving & Mirror #565 37 FTE
NAT-SIZE Blue Ridge Building Products #765 37 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sierra Insulation Contractors #879 37 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.