Collection, treatment, and disposal of waste through a sewer system · Oregon

Rogue Valley Sewer Services

Central Point, OR · ~37 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.4
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Rogue Valley Sewer Services runs at 36% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Collection, treatment, and disposal of waste through a sewer system workplace, earning a grade A.

Rogue Valley Sewer Services: 0.4 TCR = 36% of Collection, treatment, and disposal of waste through a sewer system BLS 1.2 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Rogue Valley Sewer Services safety composite

Rogue Valley Sewer Services scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 98% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

80/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.43 per 100 workers

Safer than 98% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 80% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rogue Valley Sewer Services held a steady TCR band

Rogue Valley Sewer Services's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 3.5 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=0.0 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=3.5 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221320 · Central Point, OR AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.4 · 36% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #1/11
  • PHOTO Jacobs - City of Tuc…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~37 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Jacobs - City of Tucker - OMI (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Oregon employers → · Look up another →

Rogue Valley Sewer Services in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Rogue Valley Sewer Services averages 0.4 TCR (36% of the Collection, treatment, and disposal of waste through a sewer system BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Rogue Valley Sewer Services TCR series: 2017=0 · 2018=0 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=3.5 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 1.2

Where Rogue Valley Sewer Services falls in its industry

400 Collection, treatment, and dis establishments

Safer than 98% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Oregon alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #1 safest of 11 Collection, treatment, and dis employers in Oregon.

Rogue Valley Sewer Services (37 employees, TCR 0.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 47 employees and a TCR of 4.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Rogue Valley Sewer Services
Rogue Valley Sewer Services (37 employees, TCR 0.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 47 employees and a TCR of 4.4

Rogue Valley Sewer Services has fewer employees than the Collection, treatment, and disposal of w median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 3.5 0.0 1 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221320 · OR · Central Point

400 Collection, treatment, and disposal of waste through a sewer system employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 8,031 rated employers in Oregon with headcount on file · 63 employers in Central Point, OR · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Jacobs - City of Tucker - OMI 0.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Jacobs - VANCOUVER, WA - OMI 0.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Village of Bloomingdale Water Reclamation 0.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR WasteWater Treatment Facility 0.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE BIZON NURSERY LLC 37 FTE
STATE-SIZE SNOW PEAK AREA 37 FTE
STATE-SIZE OR-Eugene RC 37 FTE
STATE-SIZE OR-Parkrose RC 37 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1287 - CENTRAL POINT OR WHSE 337 FTE
CITY-NEAR Willow Springs Complex 193 FTE
CITY-NEAR Combined Transport 182 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cardmoore 180 FTE
NAT-TCR Hodge Electrical Contractors, Inc. 0.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Forbes Homes, Inc. dba Forbes Capretto Homes 0.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Facility Solutions Group, Inc. 0.4 TCR
NAT-TCR JMEG, LLC - Austin 0.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Window Specialist Inc 37 FTE
NAT-SIZE Castro 37 FTE
NAT-SIZE Cedarburg 37 FTE
NAT-SIZE Jack Endo Electric, Inc. 37 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.