Blood derivative in-vitro diagnostic substances manufacturing · New York

Instrumentation Laboratory (Werfen)

Orangeburg, NY · ~318 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
1.7
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Instrumentation Laboratory (Werfen) runs at 52% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Blood derivative in-vitro diagnostic substances manufacturing workplace, earning a grade B.

Instrumentation Laboratory (Werfen): 1.7 TCR = 52% of Blood derivative in-vitro diagnostic substances manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Instrumentation Laboratory (Werfen) safety composite

Instrumentation Laboratory (Werfen) scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 38%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

42/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 1.73 per 100 workers

Safer than 38% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.02 per 100 workers

Safer than 41% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.6

2022→2024

Instrumentation Laboratory (Werfen) injury rate improved

Instrumentation Laboratory (Werfen)'s TCR fell 1.6 from 2.6 in 2022 to 1.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 2.6 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.59× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2022=2.6 · 2023=1.6 · 2024=1.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 325413 · Orangeburg, NY AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 1.7 · 52% of ind

  • DART 1.0 DART
  • RANK #8/14
  • PHOTO ARDx San Diego Summe…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 16 inj
  • SIZE ~318 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: ARDx San Diego Summers Ridge (Mgf) (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New York employers → · Look up another →

Instrumentation Laboratory (Werfen) in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Instrumentation Laboratory (Werfen) averages 1.7 TCR (52% of the Blood derivative in-vitro diagnostic substances manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Instrumentation Laboratory (Werfen) TCR series: 2022=2.6 · 2023=1.6 · 2024=1 · BLS 3.3

Where Instrumentation Laboratory (Werfen) falls in its industry

201 Blood derivative in-vitro diag establishments

Safer than 38% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New York alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #8 safest of 14 Blood derivative in-vitro diag employers in New York.

Instrumentation Laboratory (Werfen) (318 employees, TCR 1.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 120 employees and a TCR of 1.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02,0004,0006,000 01234 Average employees Total Case Rate Instrumentation Laboratory (Werfen)
Instrumentation Laboratory (Werfen) (318 employees, TCR 1.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 120 employees and a TCR of 1.4

Instrumentation Laboratory (Werfen) has more employees than the Blood derivative in-vitro diagnostic sub median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.0 1.0 3 0 0
2023 1.6 1.6 5 0 0
2022 2.6 2.3 8 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

325413 · NY · Orangeburg

201 Blood derivative in-vitro diagnostic substances manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 21,008 rated employers in New York with headcount on file · 29 employers in Orangeburg, NY · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR ARDx San Diego Summers Ridge (Mgf) 1.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Cell Marque Corporation 1.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Immuno Concepts, N.A Ltd 1.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR TriLink Biotechnologies LLC 1.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Skanska USA Civil Northeast 318 FTE
STATE-SIZE Wegmans Onondaga 031 318 FTE
STATE-SIZE Colonie Center 083 318 FTE
STATE-SIZE 5027 318 FTE
CITY-NEAR Nice-Pak Prod. Inc / PDI Inc. 684 FTE
CITY-NEAR API Industries Inc 488 FTE
CITY-NEAR Crestron Electronics - Orangeburg, NY 368 FTE
CITY-NEAR Chromalloy New York 366 FTE
NAT-TCR River Crossing 1.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Bobby Jones Golf Course 1.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Mdw-Flight Ops 1.7 TCR
NAT-TCR World Outdoor Emporium STC 1.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Pittman Center 318 FTE
NAT-SIZE EPI Power, LLC. 318 FTE
NAT-SIZE L3Harris 318 FTE
NAT-SIZE DFA of California 318 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.