Electrical measuring instrument repair and maintenance services · North Carolina

Instrumentation Services Inc (ISI)

Charlotte, NC · ~30 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
0.0
Avg TCR
2.1
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Instrumentation Services Inc (ISI) runs at 0% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Electrical measuring instrument repair and maintenance services workplace, earning a grade C.

Instrumentation Services Inc (ISI): 0.0 TCR = 0% of Electrical measuring instrument repair and maintenance services BLS 2.1 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Instrumentation Services Inc (ISI) safety composite

Instrumentation Services Inc (ISI) scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 100% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

80/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 100% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 79% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Instrumentation Services Inc (ISI) held a steady TCR band

Instrumentation Services Inc (ISI)'s TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2016 at 0.0 TCR.

2016=0.0 · 2017=0.0 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 811219 · Charlotte, NC AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 0.0 · 0% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #0/6
  • PHOTO Varian, Washington DC
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 0 inj
  • SIZE ~30 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Varian, Washington DC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Instrumentation Services Inc (ISI) in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Instrumentation Services Inc (ISI) averages 0.0 TCR (0% of the Electrical measuring instrument repair and maintenance services BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Instrumentation Services Inc (ISI) TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=0 · 2018=0 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · BLS 2.1

Where Instrumentation Services Inc (ISI) falls in its industry

56 Electrical measuring instrumen establishments

Safer than 100% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #0 safest of 6 Electrical measuring instrumen employers in North Carolina.

Instrumentation Services Inc (ISI) (30 employees, TCR 0.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 190 employees and a TCR of 1.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,0002,500 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Instrumentation Services Inc (ISI)
Instrumentation Services Inc (ISI) (30 employees, TCR 0.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 190 employees and a TCR of 1.1

Instrumentation Services Inc (ISI) has fewer employees than the Electrical measuring instrument repair a median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

811219 · NC · Charlotte

56 Electrical measuring instrument repair and maintenance services employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 2,058 employers in Charlotte, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Varian, Washington DC 0.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR RALEIGH HDQ 0.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Philips NAM CCSC Alpharetta, GA 0.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Pharmaceutical Calibrations and Instrumentation (PCI) 0.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Shugart Farm 30 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hays Hatchery 30 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hight Family Farms LLC 30 FTE
STATE-SIZE High Point Operations Center 30 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1101-Carolinas Medical Center (1101) 8,444 FTE
CITY-NEAR 0001-Carolinas Medical Center 8,032 FTE
CITY-NEAR 4795-AA-CLT-CHARLOTTE-CLT-TRML 7,295 FTE
CITY-NEAR Novant Health Presbyterian Medical Center 4,973 FTE
NAT-TCR Hampton Inn & Suites 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Gap Inc. - Corporate 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Atlanta - Phipps 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Meijer 208 0.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Joules Angstrom - Pataskala 30 FTE
NAT-SIZE Styrene Products, Inc. - Schofield, WI 30 FTE
NAT-SIZE Schreiter Concrete 30 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sutter Medical Foundation (185-310) 30 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.