Gas flow instrumentation, industrial process-type, manufacturing · Arizona

Instrumentation : Tucson

Name: Instrumentation : Tucson Workplace Safety Data
Creator: PlainSafetyScore
License: https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

Tucson, AZ · ~52 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

Compiled by PlainSafetyScore · August 25, 2026

A
Excellent Safety Record: 0.3
Avg TCR: 3.3
Industry avg: 0
Fatalities

Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Instrumentation : Tucson runs at 10% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Gas flow instrumentation, industrial process-type, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Instrumentation : Tucson: 0.3 TCR = 10% of Gas flow instrumentation, industrial process-type, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Instrumentation : Tucson safety composite

Instrumentation : Tucson scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 93% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 28%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

60/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR): A 0.34 per 100 workers

Safer than 93% of industry peers
DART rate: F 1.36 per 100 workers

Safer than 28% of industry peers
Fatalities: D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Instrumentation : Tucson: 0.0 → 1.4 TCR

Peak year 2021 @ 1.4 TCR · DART/TCR 4× in 2021

Instrumentation : Tucson's TCR rose 1.4 from 0.0 in 2018 to 1.4 in 2021. In 2021, DART was 4× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 334513 · Tucson, AZ AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.3 · 10% of ind

DART 1.4 DART
RANK #1/4
PHOTO Sensitech Inc
BOOK 4y book
INJ 1 inj
SIZE ~52 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Sensitech Inc (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Arizona employers → · Look up another →

This site

0.3
Sensitech Inc

0.3
Peco InspX

0.3
RdF Corporatio

0.3
Dwyer Instrume

0.3

What this shows Instrumentation : Tucson averages 0.3 TCR (10% of the Gas flow instrumentation, industrial process-type, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Instrumentation : Tucson TCR series: 2018=0 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=1.4 · BLS 3.3

Where Instrumentation : Tucson falls in its industry

322 Gas flow instrumentation, indu establishments

Safer than 93% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.3.

Grade A

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Arizona alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #1 safest of 4 Gas flow instrumentation, indu employers in Arizona.

Instrumentation : Tucson (52 employees, TCR 0.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 96 employees and a TCR of 1.3

Instrumentation : Tucson has fewer employees than the Gas flow instrumentation, industrial pro median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year	TCR	DART	Injuries
2021	1.4	1.4	1
2020	0.0	0.0	0
2019	0.0	0.0	0
2018	0.0	0.0	0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

334513 · AZ · Tucson

322 Gas flow instrumentation, industrial process-type, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 9,594 rated employers in Arizona with headcount on file · 1,150 employers in Tucson, AZ · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel	Establishment	Place	Metric
NAICS-TCR	Sensitech Inc	BEVERLY, MA	0.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR	Peco InspX	MODESTO, CA	0.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR	RdF Corporation	HUDSON, NH	0.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR	Dwyer Instruments Inc - Michigan City IN	MICHIGAN CITY, IN	0.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE	7892_18700	MARICOPA	52 FTE
STATE-SIZE	EPCOR Sun City Water, EPCOR Sun City West Water, EPCOR Sun City West Wastewater	SUN CITY	52 FTE
STATE-SIZE	5921040 - Intel Campus	CHANDLER	52 FTE
STATE-SIZE	A1 DESERT ELECTRIC CO.	AVONDALE	52 FTE
CITY-NEAR	University of Arizona	Tucson	18,951 FTE
CITY-NEAR	Raytheon_Tucson_AZ_Airport Site	Tucson	9,878 FTE
CITY-NEAR	Tucson Medical Center	Tucson	4,407 FTE
CITY-NEAR	U.S. Border Patrol Sector - Tucson	Tucson	3,989 FTE
NAT-TCR	Liberty Utilities Fifth Street	Fall River, MA	0.3 TCR
NAT-TCR	Sodexo at Tulane Univ.- Lbc	New Orleans, LA	0.3 TCR
NAT-TCR	Van Andel Institute	Grand Rapids, MI	0.3 TCR
NAT-TCR	South Field Energy Project	Wellsville, OH	0.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE	Pallet Services Inc/ Rochester Branch	Rochester, NY	52 FTE
NAT-SIZE	49311c - Redmond Dc	Redmond, WA	52 FTE
NAT-SIZE	Site Services Idaho Falls	Idaho Falls, ID	52 FTE
NAT-SIZE	CHRISTUS Dubuis Hospital of Fort Smith	Fort Smith, AR	52 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.