Insulation and cushioning, polystyrene foam plastics, manufacturing · California

Insulfoam - Dixon

Name: Insulfoam - Dixon Workplace Safety Data
Creator: PlainSafetyScore
License: https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

Dixon, CA · ~74 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

Compiled by PlainSafetyScore · August 25, 2026

C
Average Safety Record: 3.4
Avg TCR: 3.3
Industry avg: 0
Fatalities

Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Insulfoam - Dixon runs at 102% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Insulation and cushioning, polystyrene foam plastics, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade C.

Insulfoam - Dixon: 3.4 TCR = 102% of Insulation and cushioning, polystyrene foam plastics, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Insulfoam - Dixon safety composite

Insulfoam - Dixon scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 16%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

36/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR): D 3.37 per 100 workers

Safer than 43% of industry peers
DART rate: F 4.12 per 100 workers

Safer than 16% of industry peers
Fatalities: D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Insulfoam - Dixon: 2.0 → 4.1 TCR

Peak year 2018 @ 4.9 TCR · DART/TCR 1.22× in 2020

Insulfoam - Dixon's TCR rose 2.1 from 2.0 in 2016 to 4.1 in 2020. Peak filing year was 2018 at 4.9 TCR. In 2020, DART was 1.22× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 326140 · Dixon, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 3.4 · 102% of ind

DART 4.1 DART
RANK #7/14
PHOTO NPX ONE - Reading, PA
BOOK 4y book
INJ 11 inj
SIZE ~74 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: NPX ONE - Reading, PA (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

This site

3.4
NPX ONE - Read

3.4
Cascades Plast

3.4
Distribution C

3.3
UMR Board Prod

3.3

What this shows Insulfoam - Dixon averages 3.4 TCR (102% of the Insulation and cushioning, polystyrene foam plastics, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Insulfoam - Dixon TCR series: 2016=2 · 2018=4.9 · 2019=2.4 · 2020=4.1 · BLS 3.3

Where Insulfoam - Dixon falls in its industry

260 Insulation and cushioning, pol establishments

Safer than 43% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.1.

Grade C

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #7 safest of 14 Insulation and cushioning, pol employers in California.

Insulfoam - Dixon (74 employees, TCR 3.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 3.1

Insulfoam - Dixon has more employees than the Insulation and cushioning, polystyrene f median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year	TCR	DART	Injuries
2020	4.1	4.1	3
2019	2.4	1.2	2
2018	4.9	3.7	4
2016	2.0	2.0	2

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

326140 · CA · Dixon

260 Insulation and cushioning, polystyrene foam plastics, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 64 employers in Dixon, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel	Establishment	Place	Metric
NAICS-TCR	NPX ONE - Reading, PA	READING, PA	3.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR	Distribution Center	KOKOMO, IN	3.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR	UMR Board Production LLC	PLATTSBURGH, NY	3.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR	Cascades Plastics, Inc.	WARRENTON, MO	3.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE	Wonderful Orchards-New Columbia	FIREBAUGH	74 FTE
STATE-SIZE	Apricot Lane Farms	MOORPARK	74 FTE
STATE-SIZE	Central California Almond Growers (Kerman)	KERMAN	74 FTE
STATE-SIZE	Jose Jesus Garcia Jr	PORTERVILLE	74 FTE
CITY-NEAR	California Department of Transportation Facility 174	Dixon	2,579 FTE
CITY-NEAR	Mayoral Brothers Incoporated Farm Labor Contractor	Dixon	375 FTE
CITY-NEAR	5139	Dixon	316 FTE
CITY-NEAR	WM 5139	Dixon	300 FTE
NAT-TCR	Engineering & Operations Center	Hughesville, MD	3.4 TCR
NAT-TCR	WC Chilton	Chilton, WI	3.4 TCR
NAT-TCR	John Deere Seeding Group - Valley City	Valley City, ND	3.4 TCR
NAT-TCR	Country Club of Buffalo	Williamsville, NY	3.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE	Gulf Coast Medical Center	Fort Myers, FL	74 FTE
NAT-SIZE	Insteel Wire Products - Sanderson, FL	Sanderson, FL	74 FTE
NAT-SIZE	Little Falls Public School District-Lincoln Elementary	Little Falls, MN	74 FTE
NAT-SIZE	Clarion Forest VNA, INC	Clarion, PA	74 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019, 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.