Acids, organic, not specified elsewhere by process, manufacturing · California

Integrated DNA Technologies, Inc. - Redwood City

Redwood City, CA · ~24 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
0.0
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Integrated DNA Technologies, Inc. - Redwood City runs at 0% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Acids, organic, not specified elsewhere by process, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade C.

Integrated DNA Technologies, Inc. - Redwood City: 0.0 TCR = 0% of Acids, organic, not specified elsewhere by process, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Integrated DNA Technologies, Inc. - Redwood City safety composite

Integrated DNA Technologies, Inc. - Redwood City scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 100% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

79/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 100% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 75% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Integrated DNA Technologies, Inc. - Redwood City held a steady TCR band

Integrated DNA Technologies, Inc. - Redwood City's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2018. Peak filing year was 2016 at 0.0 TCR.

2016=0.0 · 2017=0.0 · 2018=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 325199 · Redwood City, CA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 0.0 · 0% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #0/17
  • PHOTO LANXESS Corporation …
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 0 inj
  • SIZE ~24 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: LANXESS Corporation Headquarters (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Integrated DNA Technologies, Inc. - Redwood City in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Integrated DNA Technologies, Inc. - Redwood City averages 0.0 TCR (0% of the Acids, organic, not specified elsewhere by process, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Integrated DNA Technologies, Inc. - Redwood City TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=0 · 2018=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Integrated DNA Technologies, Inc. - Redwood City falls in its industry

552 Acids, organic, not specified establishments

Safer than 100% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #0 safest of 17 Acids, organic, not specified employers in California.

Integrated DNA Technologies, Inc. - Redwood City (24 employees, TCR 0.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 73 employees and a TCR of 1.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 02468 Average employees Total Case Rate Integrated DNA Technologies, Inc. - Redwood City
Integrated DNA Technologies, Inc. - Redwood City (24 employees, TCR 0.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 73 employees and a TCR of 1.5

Integrated DNA Technologies, Inc. - Redwood City has fewer employees than the Acids, organic, not specified elsewhere median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

325199 · CA · Redwood City

552 Acids, organic, not specified elsewhere by process, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 116 employers in Redwood City, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR LANXESS Corporation Headquarters 0.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Invista Orange Site 0.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR The Dow Chemical Company - La Porte, TX 0.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Chevron Phillips Chemical Company Borger Plant 0.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Agro-Jal Farming Enterprises 24 FTE
STATE-SIZE MTD Farms 24 FTE
STATE-SIZE Marc Pura Ranch, LLC 24 FTE
STATE-SIZE Costa Farms 24 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 141 2,891 FTE
CITY-NEAR Guardant Health 1,513 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2032-02120851 1,471 FTE
CITY-NEAR 0206-02620851 1,382 FTE
NAT-TCR GeoCare, Inc. DBA Home Instead Senior Care 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR TX-01 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR NJ-05 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR CT-02 0.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Plant 1 24 FTE
NAT-SIZE Galax Grants Supermarket 24 FTE
NAT-SIZE Harlow's Bus Sales - Bismarck 24 FTE
NAT-SIZE RRG RTC P93 Alvarado 24 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.