Central cooling equipment and piping installation · Missouri

Integrated Facility Services

Fenton, MO · ~247 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
2.5
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Integrated Facility Services runs at 89% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Central cooling equipment and piping installation workplace, earning a grade C.

Integrated Facility Services: 2.5 TCR = 89% of Central cooling equipment and piping installation BLS 2.8 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Integrated Facility Services safety composite

Integrated Facility Services scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 60% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 42%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

51/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.5 per 100 workers

Safer than 60% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.81 per 100 workers

Safer than 42% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.0

2016→2024

Integrated Facility Services injury rate improved

Integrated Facility Services's TCR fell 1.0 from 3.6 in 2016 to 2.5 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2016 at 3.6 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.72× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=3.6 · 2017=2.7 · 2018=3.0 · 2019=3.5 · 2020=1.9 · 2021=0.9 · 2022=3.3 · 2023=1.1 · 2024=2.5

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238220 · Fenton, MO AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 2.5 · 89% of ind

  • DART 1.8 DART
  • RANK #39/90
  • PHOTO G Mechanical, Inc.
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 54 inj
  • SIZE ~247 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: G Mechanical, Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Missouri employers → · Look up another →

Integrated Facility Services in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Integrated Facility Services averages 2.5 TCR (89% of the Central cooling equipment and piping installation BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Integrated Facility Services TCR series: 2016=3.6 · 2017=2.7 · 2018=3 · 2019=3.5 · 2020=1.9 · 2021=0.9 · 2022=3.3 · 2023=1.1 · 2024=2.5 · BLS 2.8

Where Integrated Facility Services falls in its industry

5,793 Central cooling equipment and establishments

Safer than 60% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Missouri alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #39 safest of 90 Central cooling equipment and employers in Missouri.

Integrated Facility Services (247 employees, TCR 2.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 3.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250300 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Integrated Facility Services
Integrated Facility Services (247 employees, TCR 2.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 3.3

Integrated Facility Services has more employees than the Central cooling equipment and piping ins median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.5 1.8 7 0 0
2023 1.1 0.8 3 0 0
2022 3.3 2.5 8 0 0
2021 0.9 0.9 2 0 0
2020 1.9 1.4 4 0 0
2019 3.5 2.2 8 0 0
2018 3.0 1.7 7 0 0
2017 2.7 1.2 7 0 0
2016 3.6 1.8 8 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238220 · MO · Fenton

5,793 Central cooling equipment and piping installation employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,075 rated employers in Missouri with headcount on file · 154 employers in Fenton, MO · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR G Mechanical, Inc. 2.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR DAVCON INC. 2.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Accurate Mechanical Contractors, Inc. 2.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR H.E. Neumann Company 2.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Mount Vernon 247 FTE
STATE-SIZE Kansas City North Smithfield 247 FTE
STATE-SIZE Midwest Industrial Rubber, Inc. 247 FTE
STATE-SIZE 2662-6505 247 FTE
CITY-NEAR St. Clare Hospital - Fenton 1,044 FTE
CITY-NEAR UniGroup 854 FTE
CITY-NEAR Sachs Electric Company 707 FTE
CITY-NEAR MaritzCX Research LLC - Fenton 538 FTE
NAT-TCR Eversource - Tilton 2.5 TCR
NAT-TCR High Range 2.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Composites One LLC - Bristol 2.5 TCR
NAT-TCR G Mechanical, Inc. 2.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Monroeville 247 FTE
NAT-SIZE Asbury Facility 247 FTE
NAT-SIZE Mister P Express 247 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sodexo at Delta Sky Club Atl Janitorial 247 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.