Belting, rubber (e.g., conveyor, elevator, transmission), manufacturing · Missouri

Midwest Industrial Rubber, Inc.

St. Louis, MO · ~247 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.4
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Midwest Industrial Rubber, Inc. runs at 42% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Belting, rubber (e.g., conveyor, elevator, transmission), manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Midwest Industrial Rubber, Inc.: 1.4 TCR = 42% of Belting, rubber (e.g., conveyor, elevator, transmission), manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Midwest Industrial Rubber, Inc. safety composite

Midwest Industrial Rubber, Inc. scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 86% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

70/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.39 per 100 workers

Safer than 86% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0.66 per 100 workers

Safer than 66% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.8

2016→2019

Midwest Industrial Rubber, Inc. injury rate improved

Midwest Industrial Rubber, Inc.'s TCR fell 2.8 from 3.5 in 2016 to 0.7 in 2019. Peak filing year was 2016 at 3.5 TCR. In 2019, DART was 0.47× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=3.5 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=0.7

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 326220 · St. Louis, MO AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 1.4 · 42% of ind

  • DART 0.7 DART
  • RANK #2/8
  • PHOTO Cooper Standard Auto…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 10 inj
  • SIZE ~247 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Cooper Standard Automotive (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Missouri employers → · Look up another →

Midwest Industrial Rubber, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Midwest Industrial Rubber, Inc. averages 1.4 TCR (42% of the Belting, rubber (e.g., conveyor, elevator, transmission), manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Midwest Industrial Rubber, Inc. TCR series: 2016=3.5 · 2018=0 · 2019=0.7 · BLS 3.3

Where Midwest Industrial Rubber, Inc. falls in its industry

160 Belting, rubber (e.g., conveyo establishments

Safer than 86% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Missouri alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #2 safest of 8 Belting, rubber (e.g., conveyo employers in Missouri.

Midwest Industrial Rubber, Inc. (247 employees, TCR 1.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 132 employees and a TCR of 3.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Midwest Industrial Rubber, Inc.
Midwest Industrial Rubber, Inc. (247 employees, TCR 1.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 132 employees and a TCR of 3.0

Midwest Industrial Rubber, Inc. has more employees than the Belting, rubber (e.g., conveyor, elevato median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 0.7 0.7 2 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 3.5 2.2 8 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

326220 · MO · St. Louis

160 Belting, rubber (e.g., conveyor, elevator, transmission), manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,075 rated employers in Missouri with headcount on file · 686 employers in St. Louis, MO · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Cooper Standard Automotive 1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Fluid Connectors : Manhattan 1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Fenner Precision Polymers US- Wilmington 1.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Fluid Connectors : McCook 1.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Integrated Facility Services 247 FTE
STATE-SIZE Mount Vernon 247 FTE
STATE-SIZE Kansas City North Smithfield 247 FTE
STATE-SIZE 2662-6505 247 FTE
CITY-NEAR Monsanto - St. Louis 6,028 FTE
CITY-NEAR St. Anthony's Medical Center 3,706 FTE
CITY-NEAR ABI Corporation 2,720 FTE
CITY-NEAR Saint Louis University Hospital 2,084 FTE
NAT-TCR Cdsd Hq - Chicago 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR FXI Santa Teresa 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Rayotek 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR NEC Energy Solutions, Inc. 1.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE American Appliance Products Newport 247 FTE
NAT-SIZE FLSmidth USA Inc. - Tucson Operations 247 FTE
NAT-SIZE Minerva Manufacturing Facility 247 FTE
NAT-SIZE 1901 Mechanical and Plumbing 247 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.