Bonded warehousing, general merchandise · Texas

Interload Forwarding, LLC - Laredo

Laredo, TX · ~31 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.5
Avg TCR
5.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Interload Forwarding, LLC - Laredo runs at 26% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Bonded warehousing, general merchandise workplace, earning a grade A.

Interload Forwarding, LLC - Laredo: 1.5 TCR = 26% of Bonded warehousing, general merchandise BLS 5.8 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Interload Forwarding, LLC - Laredo safety composite

Interload Forwarding, LLC - Laredo scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 86% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

75/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.51 per 100 workers

Safer than 81% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 86% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Interload Forwarding, LLC - Laredo held a steady TCR band

Interload Forwarding, LLC - Laredo's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2019 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 5.3 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=3.7 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=5.3 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 493110 · Laredo, TX AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 1.5 · 26% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #209/846
  • PHOTO Lafayette Logistics …
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~31 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Lafayette Logistics Center (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Interload Forwarding, LLC - Laredo in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Interload Forwarding, LLC - Laredo averages 1.5 TCR (26% of the Bonded warehousing, general merchandise BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Interload Forwarding, LLC - Laredo TCR series: 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=3.7 · 2022=0 · 2023=5.3 · 2024=0 · BLS 5.8

Where Interload Forwarding, LLC - Laredo falls in its industry

9,477 Bonded warehousing, general me establishments

Safer than 81% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #209 safest of 846 Bonded warehousing, general me employers in Texas.

Interload Forwarding, LLC - Laredo (31 employees, TCR 1.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Interload Forwarding, LLC - Laredo
Interload Forwarding, LLC - Laredo (31 employees, TCR 1.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 3.5

Interload Forwarding, LLC - Laredo has fewer employees than the Bonded warehousing, general merchandise median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 5.3 5.3 2 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 3.7 3.7 1 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

493110 · TX · Laredo

9,477 Bonded warehousing, general merchandise employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 245 employers in Laredo, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Lafayette Logistics Center 1.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Fostoria DC 1.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Palmer Logistics Warehouse 6 (AmeriPort) 1.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Tosca - San Antonio 1.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE TREES USA 31 FTE
STATE-SIZE Treeland Nursery Inc 31 FTE
STATE-SIZE 145 Ranch LLC 31 FTE
STATE-SIZE Cobalt Cattle Company LLC - Tulia 31 FTE
CITY-NEAR Office of Field Operations - Laredo 3,395 FTE
CITY-NEAR U.S. Border Patrol Sector - Laredo 1,775 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2576-21080000-21080 748 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2576-62 672 FTE
NAT-TCR Trinity Col Mather 1.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Protocol 1.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Courtyard Savannah Downtown/Historic District 1.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Espina Paving, Inc. 1.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Fairfield Inn Mission Viejo 31 FTE
NAT-SIZE Elkhorn River Farms 31 FTE
NAT-SIZE Equilibar, LLC 31 FTE
NAT-SIZE Dynamic Air Engineering Inc. 31 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.