Acceleration indicators and systems components, aerospace type, manufacturing · North Carolina

Dynamic Air Engineering Inc.

Claremont, NC · ~31 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
1.7
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Dynamic Air Engineering Inc. runs at 52% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Acceleration indicators and systems components, aerospace type, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade B.

Dynamic Air Engineering Inc.: 1.7 TCR = 52% of Acceleration indicators and systems components, aerospace type, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Dynamic Air Engineering Inc. safety composite

Dynamic Air Engineering Inc. scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 75% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 20%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

47/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 1.73 per 100 workers

Safer than 20% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 75% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Dynamic Air Engineering Inc.: 1.9 → 3.0 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 3.0 TCR · DART/TCR 0× in 2024

Dynamic Air Engineering Inc.'s TCR rose 1.0 from 1.9 in 2019 to 3.0 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 334511 · Claremont, NC AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 1.7 · 52% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #4/7
  • PHOTO Sechan Electronics, …
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~31 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Sechan Electronics, Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Dynamic Air Engineering Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Dynamic Air Engineering Inc. averages 1.7 TCR (52% of the Acceleration indicators and systems components, aerospace type, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Dynamic Air Engineering Inc. TCR series: 2019=1.9 · 2021=2 · 2023=0 · 2024=3 · BLS 3.3

Where Dynamic Air Engineering Inc. falls in its industry

388 Acceleration indicators and sy establishments

Safer than 20% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 0.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #4 safest of 7 Acceleration indicators and sy employers in North Carolina.

Dynamic Air Engineering Inc. (31 employees, TCR 1.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 207 employees and a TCR of 0.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,000 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Dynamic Air Engineering Inc.
Dynamic Air Engineering Inc. (31 employees, TCR 1.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 207 employees and a TCR of 0.7

Dynamic Air Engineering Inc. has fewer employees than the Acceleration indicators and systems comp median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 0.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 3.0 0.0 1 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 2.0 2.0 1 0 0
2019 1.9 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

334511 · NC · Claremont

388 Acceleration indicators and systems components, aerospace type, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 28 employers in Claremont, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Sechan Electronics, Inc. 1.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR B&E Tool Company 1.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Aviation Systems : HI, Kekaha - PMRF Bldg. 384, Lii Rd. (AS-MN) 1.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Kearfott Corporation 1.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Todd Glover Farms Inc 31 FTE
STATE-SIZE Sunny Creek Farm Inc. 31 FTE
STATE-SIZE Rowan 31 FTE
STATE-SIZE CPI USA NC LLC - Roxboro 31 FTE
CITY-NEAR Claremont Plant 858 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hickory DC & HUB / Sutter East - Claremont 751 FTE
CITY-NEAR CommScope Claremont Facility 705 FTE
CITY-NEAR Claremont 672 FTE
NAT-TCR Hazlehurst 1.7 TCR
NAT-TCR 0879 - Lincoln South 1.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Google Hemisphere Cafe 1.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Hollywood on Prem 1.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Elkhorn River Farms 31 FTE
NAT-SIZE Lmmm Dallas #36, LTD. 31 FTE
NAT-SIZE Lauderdale Electric 31 FTE
NAT-SIZE Interload Forwarding, LLC - Laredo 31 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2021, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.