Warehousing (except farm products, general merchandise, refrigerated) · Louisiana

International Matex Tank Terminals-St Rose

St Rose, LA · ~165 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.9
Avg TCR
5.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

International Matex Tank Terminals-St Rose runs at 16% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Warehousing (except farm products, general merchandise, refrigerated) workplace, earning a grade A.

International Matex Tank Terminals-St Rose: 0.9 TCR = 16% of Warehousing (except farm products, general merchandise, refrigerated) BLS 5.8 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

International Matex Tank Terminals-St Rose safety composite

International Matex Tank Terminals-St Rose scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 83% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

65/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 0.93 per 100 workers

Safer than 83% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0.6 per 100 workers

Safer than 55% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

International Matex Tank Terminals-St Rose held a steady TCR band

International Matex Tank Terminals-St Rose's TCR held near 0.3 from 1.5 in 2016 to 1.2 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2016 at 1.5 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.65× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=1.5 · 2017=0.5 · 2021=0.6 · 2023=1.2

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 493190 · St Rose, LA AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 0.9 · 16% of ind

  • DART 0.6 DART
  • RANK #6/15
  • PHOTO LSIM
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 7 inj
  • SIZE ~165 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: LSIM (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Louisiana employers → · Look up another →

International Matex Tank Terminals-St Rose in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows International Matex Tank Terminals-St Rose averages 0.9 TCR (16% of the Warehousing (except farm products, general merchandise, refrigerated) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

International Matex Tank Terminals-St Rose TCR series: 2016=1.5 · 2017=0.5 · 2021=0.6 · 2023=1.2 · BLS 5.8

Where International Matex Tank Terminals-St Rose falls in its industry

453 Warehousing (except farm produ establishments

Safer than 83% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Louisiana alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #6 safest of 15 Warehousing (except farm produ employers in Louisiana.

International Matex Tank Terminals-St Rose (165 employees, TCR 0.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 2.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate International Matex Tank Terminals-St Rose
International Matex Tank Terminals-St Rose (165 employees, TCR 0.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 2.7

International Matex Tank Terminals-St Rose has more employees than the Warehousing (except farm products, gener median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 1.2 0.6 2 0 0
2021 0.6 0.6 1 0 0
2017 0.5 0.0 1 0 0
2016 1.5 1.0 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

493190 · LA · St Rose

453 Warehousing (except farm products, general merchandise, refrigerated) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 6,723 rated employers in Louisiana with headcount on file · 6 employers in St Rose, LA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR LSIM 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR 700 Distribution Dr (fka 680), Atlanta, GA 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR AWC Baltimore Transformation Center (BTC) 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Fluor Federal Petroleum Operations - Bayou Choctaw 0.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Schlumberger 165 FTE
STATE-SIZE Command Construction 165 FTE
STATE-SIZE Star Service Inc of Baton Rouge 165 FTE
STATE-SIZE The Foust Group 165 FTE
CITY-NEAR New Orleans 66 FTE
CITY-NEAR 4451 New Orleans 60 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2288-0292 51 FTE
CITY-NEAR NFM - Louisiana 32 FTE
NAT-TCR TPAC, A Division of EnCon United 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Armistead Mechanical-New York 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR El Jen Healthcare 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR McCarter 0.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE 4223-M2200 165 FTE
NAT-SIZE Shick Esteve - Kansas City 165 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hard Rock Directional Drilling LLC 165 FTE
NAT-SIZE Lewisburg Printing Company 165 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2021, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.