Belt conveyor systems manufacturing · Missouri

Shick Esteve - Kansas City

Kansas City, MO · ~165 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.6
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Shick Esteve - Kansas City runs at 49% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Belt conveyor systems manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Shick Esteve - Kansas City: 1.6 TCR = 49% of Belt conveyor systems manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Shick Esteve - Kansas City safety composite

Shick Esteve - Kansas City scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 75% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 44%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

58/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.61 per 100 workers

Safer than 75% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.19 per 100 workers

Safer than 44% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.6

2017→2023

Shick Esteve - Kansas City injury rate improved

Shick Esteve - Kansas City's TCR fell 1.6 from 2.8 in 2017 to 1.2 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2022 at 3.0 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.74× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=2.8 · 2019=2.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.7 · 2022=3.0 · 2023=1.2

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 333922 · Kansas City, MO AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 1.6 · 49% of ind

  • DART 1.2 DART
  • RANK #4/10
  • PHOTO WEBB-STILES COMPANY
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 16 inj
  • SIZE ~165 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: WEBB-STILES COMPANY (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Missouri employers → · Look up another →

Shick Esteve - Kansas City in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Shick Esteve - Kansas City averages 1.6 TCR (49% of the Belt conveyor systems manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Shick Esteve - Kansas City TCR series: 2017=2.8 · 2019=2 · 2020=0 · 2021=0.7 · 2022=3 · 2023=1.2 · BLS 3.3

Where Shick Esteve - Kansas City falls in its industry

361 Belt conveyor systems manufact establishments

Safer than 75% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Missouri alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #4 safest of 10 Belt conveyor systems manufact employers in Missouri.

Shick Esteve - Kansas City (165 employees, TCR 1.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 76 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 024681012 Average employees Total Case Rate Shick Esteve - Kansas City
Shick Esteve - Kansas City (165 employees, TCR 1.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 76 employees and a TCR of 3.5

Shick Esteve - Kansas City has more employees than the Belt conveyor systems manufacturing median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 1.2 1.2 2 0 0
2022 3.0 0.6 5 0 0
2021 0.7 0.7 2 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 2.0 2.0 3 0 0
2017 2.8 0.7 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

333922 · MO · Kansas City

361 Belt conveyor systems manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,075 rated employers in Missouri with headcount on file · 1,023 employers in Kansas City, MO · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR WEBB-STILES COMPANY 1.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Bosch Rexroth 1.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Fortna - NAP Projects 1.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Carter Control Systems, Inc 1.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE McCarthy Buidling Companies, Inc St Louis Office 165 FTE
STATE-SIZE .Johnson Controls 165 FTE
STATE-SIZE Daikin Taycon LLC - TMI - 715 Goddard 165 FTE
STATE-SIZE 1565 LOWE S OF LIBERTY MO 165 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mass Service Organization 11,859 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hallmark Cards Mass Channel 11,578 FTE
CITY-NEAR Global Merchandising Services (GMS) 9,548 FTE
CITY-NEAR Children's Mercy - Missouri 7,709 FTE
NAT-TCR Rubbercycle 1.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Adams Burch 1.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Charles Messina Plumbing & Electric Co 1.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Brimar Industries 1.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE International Matex Tank Terminals-St Rose 165 FTE
NAT-SIZE Dept. of Labor & Workforce Development (5) 165 FTE
NAT-SIZE 4223-M2200 165 FTE
NAT-SIZE Teufelberger Fiber Rope Corp 165 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.