Other Heavy and Civil Engineering Construction · Georgia

International Paper Flint River

Oglethorpe, GA · ~58 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
1.5
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

International Paper Flint River runs at 53% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Other Heavy and Civil Engineering Construction workplace, earning a grade B.

International Paper Flint River: 1.5 TCR = 53% of Other Heavy and Civil Engineering Construction BLS 2.8 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

International Paper Flint River safety composite

International Paper Flint River scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 73% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

59/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 1.48 per 100 workers

Safer than 50% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 73% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.0

2019→2023

International Paper Flint River injury rate improved

International Paper Flint River's TCR fell 3.0 from 3.0 in 2019 to 0.0 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2019 at 3.0 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2019=3.0 · 2020=1.4 · 2022=1.5 · 2023=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 237990 · Oglethorpe, GA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 1.5 · 53% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #10/21
  • PHOTO McGraw Kokosing, Inc.
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~58 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: McGraw Kokosing, Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Georgia employers → · Look up another →

International Paper Flint River in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows International Paper Flint River averages 1.5 TCR (53% of the Other Heavy and Civil Engineering Construction BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

International Paper Flint River TCR series: 2019=3 · 2020=1.4 · 2022=1.5 · 2023=0 · BLS 2.8

Where International Paper Flint River falls in its industry

932 Other Heavy and Civil Engineer establishments

Safer than 50% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Georgia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #10 safest of 21 Other Heavy and Civil Engineer employers in Georgia.

International Paper Flint River (58 employees, TCR 1.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 69 employees and a TCR of 1.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate International Paper Flint River
International Paper Flint River (58 employees, TCR 1.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 69 employees and a TCR of 1.5

International Paper Flint River has fewer employees than the Other Heavy and Civil Engineering Constr median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 1.5 0.0 1 0 0
2020 1.4 0.0 1 0 0
2019 3.0 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

237990 · GA · Oglethorpe

932 Other Heavy and Civil Engineering Construction employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 14,941 rated employers in Georgia with headcount on file · 7 employers in Oglethorpe, GA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR McGraw Kokosing, Inc. 1.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Badgerland Connections 1.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Power Engineering Construction Co. 1.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR GeoTech 1.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Sanderson Farms Adel Hatchery 58 FTE
STATE-SIZE Chick Hatchery 58 FTE
STATE-SIZE Valdosta Operating/Fleet - 200 Miller Street Valdosta 58 FTE
STATE-SIZE Southern Rivers Energy an Electric Membership Corporation, Inc. 58 FTE
CITY-NEAR International Paper 338 FTE
CITY-NEAR Flint River 300 FTE
CITY-NEAR Bilfinger Industrial Services 75 FTE
CITY-NEAR Oglethorpe Hatchery 39 FTE
NAT-TCR Astoria 1.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Virtua Pulmonary - Marlton 1.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Bay Shore, Ny #00347 1.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Southern Aluminum Manufacturing Acquisition, Inc. 1.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE CS Nevada 58 FTE
NAT-SIZE Marathon Petroleum Corp St Paul Park MN 58 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sodexo at Doane College 58 FTE
NAT-SIZE Gamco Corporation New York 58 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.