Pile driving, marine · California

Power Engineering Construction Co.

Alameda, CA · ~109 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
1.5
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Power Engineering Construction Co. runs at 53% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Pile driving, marine workplace, earning a grade B.

Power Engineering Construction Co.: 1.5 TCR = 53% of Pile driving, marine BLS 2.8 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Power Engineering Construction Co. safety composite

Power Engineering Construction Co. scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 73% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

59/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 1.49 per 100 workers

Safer than 50% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 73% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Power Engineering Construction Co. held a steady TCR band

Power Engineering Construction Co.'s TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 2.7 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=0.0 · 2018=2.2 · 2019=2.3 · 2020=2.7 · 2021=1.8 · 2022=2.1 · 2023=0.9 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 237990 · Alameda, CA AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 1.5 · 53% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #33/92
  • PHOTO GCT JV Constructors
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 12 inj
  • SIZE ~109 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: GCT JV Constructors (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Power Engineering Construction Co. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Power Engineering Construction Co. averages 1.5 TCR (53% of the Pile driving, marine BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Power Engineering Construction Co. TCR series: 2017=0 · 2018=2.2 · 2019=2.3 · 2020=2.7 · 2021=1.8 · 2022=2.1 · 2023=0.9 · 2024=0 · BLS 2.8

Where Power Engineering Construction Co. falls in its industry

932 Pile driving, marine establishments

Safer than 50% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #33 safest of 92 Pile driving, marine employers in California.

Power Engineering Construction Co. (109 employees, TCR 1.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 69 employees and a TCR of 1.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Power Engineering Construction Co.
Power Engineering Construction Co. (109 employees, TCR 1.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 69 employees and a TCR of 1.5

Power Engineering Construction Co. has more employees than the Pile driving, marine median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.9 0.0 1 0 0
2022 2.1 1.0 1 1 0
2021 1.8 1.8 2 0 0
2020 2.7 2.7 3 0 0
2019 2.3 2.3 3 0 0
2018 2.2 2.2 2 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

237990 · CA · Alameda

932 Pile driving, marine employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 79 employers in Alameda, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR GCT JV Constructors 1.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Woodland Pulp LLC 1.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR LEO Construction Co. 1.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Turnagain Marine Construction Corporation 1.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE BRAVANTE FARM MANAGEMENT 109 FTE
STATE-SIZE John Kautz Farms - Lodi, CA 109 FTE
STATE-SIZE G4 Farm Labor, Inc. 109 FTE
STATE-SIZE Elvira Sandoval 109 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 626 2,891 FTE
CITY-NEAR Penumbra, Inc. 2,548 FTE
CITY-NEAR Penumbra, Inc. - Alameda Campus 2,299 FTE
CITY-NEAR Webcor Builders 1,688 FTE
NAT-TCR 8201 St Thomas 1.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Molson Coors Beverage Company 1.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Kingsbridge 1.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Hyatt Plac Fort Worth TCU 1.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE 2671 Avon 109 FTE
NAT-SIZE 2673 N Dartmouth 109 FTE
NAT-SIZE 6334 St Augustine 109 FTE
NAT-SIZE 3820 West Cleveland 109 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.