Boxes, corrugated and solid fiber, made from purchased paper or paperboard · North Carolina

International Paper Lumberton

Lumberton, NC · ~145 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.9
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

International Paper Lumberton runs at 28% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Boxes, corrugated and solid fiber, made from purchased paper or paperboard workplace, earning a grade A.

International Paper Lumberton: 0.9 TCR = 28% of Boxes, corrugated and solid fiber, made from purchased paper or paperboard BLS 3.3 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

International Paper Lumberton safety composite

International Paper Lumberton scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 87% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

76/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 0.92 per 100 workers

Safer than 87% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 83% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.7

2022→2023

International Paper Lumberton injury rate improved

International Paper Lumberton's TCR fell 0.7 from 1.3 in 2022 to 0.6 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2022 at 1.3 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2022=1.3 · 2023=0.6

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 322211 · Lumberton, NC AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 0.9 · 28% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #17/61
  • PHOTO International Paper …
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~145 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: International Paper - Plant City Container (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

International Paper Lumberton in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows International Paper Lumberton averages 0.9 TCR (28% of the Boxes, corrugated and solid fiber, made from purchased paper or paperboard BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

International Paper Lumberton TCR series: 2022=1.3 · 2023=0.6 · BLS 3.3

Where International Paper Lumberton falls in its industry

1,338 Boxes, corrugated and solid fi establishments

Safer than 87% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #17 safest of 61 Boxes, corrugated and solid fi employers in North Carolina.

International Paper Lumberton (145 employees, TCR 0.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 102 employees and a TCR of 2.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0123456 Average employees Total Case Rate International Paper Lumberton
International Paper Lumberton (145 employees, TCR 0.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 102 employees and a TCR of 2.4

International Paper Lumberton has more employees than the Boxes, corrugated and solid fiber, made median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 0.6 0.0 1 0 0
2022 1.3 0.6 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

322211 · NC · Lumberton

1,338 Boxes, corrugated and solid fiber, made from purchased paper or paperboard employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 80 employers in Lumberton, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR International Paper - Plant City Container 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Gilster Corrugated 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Galesburg Container 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Corrchoice 0.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE 6728-00030023-32 145 FTE
STATE-SIZE Goldsboro Milling Company 145 FTE
STATE-SIZE IPG - Colfax 145 FTE
STATE-SIZE SCS Desco 145 FTE
CITY-NEAR UNC HEALTH SOUTHEASTERN 1,792 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 1155 386 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1155 385 FTE
CITY-NEAR Quickie Manufacturing 307 FTE
NAT-TCR Elcon 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Enhanced Tool, Inc. 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR D89 San Diego 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Nestle Purina Support Center 0.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Berry Global Woodstock, IL Location 145 FTE
NAT-SIZE NOW Foods - Roselle 145 FTE
NAT-SIZE Reyco Granning, LLC 145 FTE
NAT-SIZE Commercial HVAC Americas : SVC-Greater Northeast : SVC-Pine Brook NJ-USA 145 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.