Corrugated and solid fiber boxes made from purchased paper or paperboard · Virginia

International Paper Richmond

Richmond, VA · ~118 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.2
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

International Paper Richmond runs at 35% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Corrugated and solid fiber boxes made from purchased paper or paperboard workplace, earning a grade A.

International Paper Richmond: 1.2 TCR = 35% of Corrugated and solid fiber boxes made from purchased paper or paperboard BLS 3.3 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

International Paper Richmond safety composite

International Paper Richmond scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 81% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 40%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

59/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.16 per 100 workers

Safer than 81% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.49 per 100 workers

Safer than 40% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

International Paper Richmond: 0.8 → 1.5 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 1.5 TCR · DART/TCR 1.28× in 2024

International Paper Richmond's TCR rose 0.7 from 0.8 in 2023 to 1.5 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 1.28× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 322211 · Richmond, VA AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 1.2 · 35% of ind

  • DART 1.5 DART
  • RANK #4/25
  • PHOTO Carolina Container L…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~118 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Carolina Container Laurinburg (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Virginia employers → · Look up another →

International Paper Richmond in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows International Paper Richmond averages 1.2 TCR (35% of the Corrugated and solid fiber boxes made from purchased paper or paperboard BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

International Paper Richmond TCR series: 2023=0.8 · 2024=1.5 · BLS 3.3

Where International Paper Richmond falls in its industry

1,338 Corrugated and solid fiber box establishments

Safer than 81% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Virginia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #4 safest of 25 Corrugated and solid fiber box employers in Virginia.

International Paper Richmond (118 employees, TCR 1.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 102 employees and a TCR of 2.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0123456 Average employees Total Case Rate International Paper Richmond
International Paper Richmond (118 employees, TCR 1.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 102 employees and a TCR of 2.4

International Paper Richmond has more employees than the Corrugated and solid fiber boxes made fr median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.5 1.5 2 0 0
2023 0.8 0.8 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

322211 · VA · Richmond

1,338 Corrugated and solid fiber boxes made from purchased paper or paperboard employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,673 rated employers in Virginia with headcount on file · 939 employers in Richmond, VA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Carolina Container Laurinburg 1.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Welch Packaging Columbus 1.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR 4380 Hanover Park IL Sheet Feeder 1.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR PackageOne-Madera 1.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Howard Shockey & Sons 118 FTE
STATE-SIZE I-64 Capacity Improvs. Segment II 118 FTE
STATE-SIZE 4201 Park Place Ct. Glen Allen VA 23060 118 FTE
STATE-SIZE Inspiration Plumbing LLC 118 FTE
CITY-NEAR VCU Health System 14,536 FTE
CITY-NEAR Virginia Commonwealth University 11,826 FTE
CITY-NEAR VCU 5,271 FTE
CITY-NEAR CJW Medical Center 3,259 FTE
NAT-TCR Je Construction Services, LLC 1.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Grass Roots Farming LLC. 1.2 TCR
NAT-TCR 3305-Tucson Hauling 1.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Blue Origin HSV MC, LLC 1.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE European Imports 118 FTE
NAT-SIZE P.W. Campbell Contracting Co 118 FTE
NAT-SIZE Altium Packaging - Turners Falls Plant 118 FTE
NAT-SIZE 02229 - Store 02229 Monroe 118 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.