Boxes, corrugated and solid fiber, made from purchased paper or paperboard · New York

International Paper Utica Sheet Plant

Utica, NY · ~67 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
2.6
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

International Paper Utica Sheet Plant runs at 80% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Boxes, corrugated and solid fiber, made from purchased paper or paperboard workplace, earning a grade C.

International Paper Utica Sheet Plant: 2.6 TCR = 80% of Boxes, corrugated and solid fiber, made from purchased paper or paperboard BLS 3.3 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

International Paper Utica Sheet Plant safety composite

International Paper Utica Sheet Plant scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 83% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 44%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

59/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 2.65 per 100 workers

Safer than 44% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 83% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

International Paper Utica Sheet Plant: 1.5 → 4.8 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 4.8 TCR · DART/TCR 0× in 2024

International Paper Utica Sheet Plant's TCR rose 3.3 from 1.5 in 2022 to 4.8 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 322211 · Utica, NY AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 2.6 · 80% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #19/41
  • PHOTO Pratt (Georgia Box),…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 5 inj
  • SIZE ~67 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Pratt (Georgia Box), Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New York employers → · Look up another →

International Paper Utica Sheet Plant in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows International Paper Utica Sheet Plant averages 2.6 TCR (80% of the Boxes, corrugated and solid fiber, made from purchased paper or paperboard BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

International Paper Utica Sheet Plant TCR series: 2022=1.5 · 2023=1.6 · 2024=4.8 · BLS 3.3

Where International Paper Utica Sheet Plant falls in its industry

1,338 Boxes, corrugated and solid fi establishments

Safer than 44% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New York alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #19 safest of 41 Boxes, corrugated and solid fi employers in New York.

International Paper Utica Sheet Plant (67 employees, TCR 2.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 102 employees and a TCR of 2.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0123456 Average employees Total Case Rate International Paper Utica Sheet Plant
International Paper Utica Sheet Plant (67 employees, TCR 2.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 102 employees and a TCR of 2.4

International Paper Utica Sheet Plant has fewer employees than the Boxes, corrugated and solid fiber, made median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 4.8 0.0 3 0 0
2023 1.6 0.0 1 0 0
2022 1.5 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

322211 · NY · Utica

1,338 Boxes, corrugated and solid fiber, made from purchased paper or paperboard employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 21,008 rated employers in New York with headcount on file · 148 employers in Utica, NY · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Pratt (Georgia Box), Inc. 2.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Gulf Packaging Inc 2.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Fleetwood-Fibre Packaging & Graphics 2.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR MARSHALLTOWN, IA 2.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE 100 OLD CNTRY RD HICKS-NY08 67 FTE
STATE-SIZE Quality Lineals USA, Inc. 67 FTE
STATE-SIZE Penn II Widening Skanska Penn Station Construction JV 90008290 67 FTE
STATE-SIZE Specialty Construction System Inc. 67 FTE
CITY-NEAR Resource Center for Independent Living 3,351 FTE
CITY-NEAR Faxton St. Lukes 1,727 FTE
CITY-NEAR St Elizabeth Medical Center 1,324 FTE
CITY-NEAR Utica University 915 FTE
NAT-TCR Tuscaloosa Processing 2.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Jack Daniel Distillery 2.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Bulk First LLC 2.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Rodelle Inc 2.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE KRP Transport LLC 67 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hotel Elkhart 67 FTE
NAT-SIZE MPW Industrial Services, Inc. - Kenworth 67 FTE
NAT-SIZE 100 Prospect Street Naugatuck, CT, 06770 67 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.