Drydock, floating, building · Florida

International Ship Repair & Marine Services, Inc.

Tampa, FL · ~152 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
6.9
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

International Ship Repair & Marine Services, Inc. runs at 208% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Drydock, floating, building workplace, earning a grade F.

International Ship Repair & Marine Services, Inc.: 6.9 TCR = 208% of Drydock, floating, building BLS 3.3 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

International Ship Repair & Marine Services, Inc. safety composite

International Ship Repair & Marine Services, Inc. scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 52% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 20%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

30/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 6.86 per 100 workers

Safer than 26% of industry peers

DART rate
F 5.62 per 100 workers

Safer than 20% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.5

2016→2019

International Ship Repair & Marine Services, Inc. injury rate improved

International Ship Repair & Marine Services, Inc.'s TCR fell 2.5 from 8.1 in 2016 to 5.6 in 2019. Peak filing year was 2016 at 8.1 TCR. In 2019, DART was 0.82× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=8.1 · 2019=5.6

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 336611 · Tampa, FL ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 6.9 · 208% of ind

  • DART 5.6 DART
  • RANK #34/47
  • PHOTO PACSHIP
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 24 inj
  • SIZE ~152 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: PACSHIP (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Florida employers → · Look up another →

International Ship Repair & Marine Services, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows International Ship Repair & Marine Services, Inc. averages 6.9 TCR (208% of the Drydock, floating, building BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

International Ship Repair & Marine Services, Inc. TCR series: 2016=8.1 · 2019=5.6 · BLS 3.3

Where International Ship Repair & Marine Services, Inc. falls in its industry

454 Drydock, floating, building establishments

Safer than 26% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Florida alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #34 safest of 47 Drydock, floating, building employers in Florida.

International Ship Repair & Marine Services, Inc. (152 employees, TCR 6.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 100 employees and a TCR of 4.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate International Ship Repair & Marine Services, Inc.
International Ship Repair & Marine Services, Inc. (152 employees, TCR 6.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 100 employees and a TCR of 4.2

International Ship Repair & Marine Services, Inc. has more employees than the Drydock, floating, building median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 5.6 5.6 8 0 0
2016 8.1 5.6 16 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

336611 · FL · Tampa

454 Drydock, floating, building employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 26,569 rated employers in Florida with headcount on file · 1,659 employers in Tampa, FL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR PACSHIP 6.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Blakeley Boatworks 6.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR IMIA, LLC Norfolk 6.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR ASI Services Inc. 6.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Orlando Operations Center 152 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hedrick Brothers Construction 152 FTE
STATE-SIZE Energy Erectors Inc. 152 FTE
STATE-SIZE Banko Overhead Doors, Inc 152 FTE
CITY-NEAR Diversified Maintenance Systems LLC 10,600 FTE
CITY-NEAR Tampa General Hospital 7,849 FTE
CITY-NEAR Valet Living, LLC 6,337 FTE
CITY-NEAR ST. Joseph's Hospital (5100) 5,540 FTE
NAT-TCR The Villagr at Ocotillo 6.9 TCR
NAT-TCR The Outlet Collection/Seattle 6.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Cox Automotive - Manheim Dallas 6.9 TCR
NAT-TCR SYG-Kansas City 6.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Tolstoy Foundation Rehabilitation and Nursing Center 152 FTE
NAT-SIZE Great Lakes Senior Care 81-0633191 152 FTE
NAT-SIZE Lodge (HY) 152 FTE
NAT-SIZE Truck Service Inc 152 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.