Rotogravure printing (except books) · Massachusetts

INTERPRINT, Inc.

Pittsfield, MA · ~169 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
6.9
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

INTERPRINT, Inc. runs at 208% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Rotogravure printing (except books) workplace, earning a grade F.

INTERPRINT, Inc.: 6.9 TCR = 208% of Rotogravure printing (except books) BLS 3.3 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

INTERPRINT, Inc. safety composite

INTERPRINT, Inc. scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 8%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

25/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 6.87 per 100 workers

Safer than 8% of industry peers

DART rate
F 2.66 per 100 workers

Safer than 26% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.7

2016→2024

INTERPRINT, Inc. injury rate improved

INTERPRINT, Inc.'s TCR fell 3.7 from 6.3 in 2016 to 2.7 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 10.0 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.39× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=6.3 · 2017=8.4 · 2018=6.4 · 2019=5.7 · 2020=6.5 · 2021=9.4 · 2022=10.0 · 2023=6.5 · 2024=2.7

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 323111 · Pittsfield, MA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 6.9 · 208% of ind

  • DART 2.7 DART
  • RANK #37/40
  • PHOTO WAUKEE IA
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 97 inj
  • SIZE ~169 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: WAUKEE IA (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Massachusetts employers → · Look up another →

INTERPRINT, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows INTERPRINT, Inc. averages 6.9 TCR (208% of the Rotogravure printing (except books) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

INTERPRINT, Inc. TCR series: 2016=6.3 · 2017=8.4 · 2018=6.4 · 2019=5.7 · 2020=6.5 · 2021=9.4 · 2022=10 · 2023=6.5 · 2024=2.7 · BLS 3.3

Where INTERPRINT, Inc. falls in its industry

2,001 Rotogravure printing (except b establishments

Safer than 8% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Massachusetts alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #37 safest of 40 Rotogravure printing (except b employers in Massachusetts.

INTERPRINT, Inc. (169 employees, TCR 6.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 76 employees and a TCR of 2.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate INTERPRINT, Inc.
INTERPRINT, Inc. (169 employees, TCR 6.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 76 employees and a TCR of 2.6

INTERPRINT, Inc. has more employees than the Rotogravure printing (except books) median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.7 2.7 4 1 0
2023 6.5 5.3 11 0 0
2022 10.0 8.2 13 3 0
2021 9.4 7.6 16 0 0
2020 6.5 4.5 8 2 0
2019 5.7 3.6 11 0 0
2018 6.4 3.9 12 1 0
2017 8.4 6.2 11 4 0
2016 6.3 5.8 11 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

323111 · MA · Pittsfield

2,001 Rotogravure printing (except books) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,108 rated employers in Massachusetts with headcount on file · 94 employers in Pittsfield, MA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR WAUKEE IA 6.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR G3 Enterprises, Inc. - Tapp Label 6.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Anderberg Innovative Print Solution 6.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Shipman Printing Industries, Inc. 6.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE All States Construction, Inc. Sunderland 169 FTE
STATE-SIZE All States Asphalt Sunderland 169 FTE
STATE-SIZE Axion Specialty Contracting 169 FTE
STATE-SIZE BluRoc, LLC 169 FTE
CITY-NEAR Springside Rehabilitation & Skilled Care Center 3,103 FTE
CITY-NEAR HMAPF01 1,263 FTE
CITY-NEAR Berkshire County Arc, Inc. 705 FTE
CITY-NEAR HMAPFB1 572 FTE
NAT-TCR Correctional Facility 6.9 TCR
NAT-TCR 313011-Sanford | ME | SME-600 6.9 TCR
NAT-TCR MiTek 6.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Amazon.com Services LLC - DNK5 6.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Solomon Colors, Inc. Springfield 169 FTE
NAT-SIZE USA - East Windsor 169 FTE
NAT-SIZE Container Research Corporation 169 FTE
NAT-SIZE Omni Continuing Care 169 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.