Batteries, automotive, merchant wholesalers · Wisconsin

Interstate Batteries of Green Bay

Appleton, WI · ~29 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
9.3
Avg TCR
2.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Interstate Batteries of Green Bay runs at 424% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Batteries, automotive, merchant wholesalers workplace, earning a grade F.

Interstate Batteries of Green Bay: 9.3 TCR = 424% of Batteries, automotive, merchant wholesalers BLS 2.2 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Interstate Batteries of Green Bay safety composite

Interstate Batteries of Green Bay scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 86% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 16%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

49/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 9.33 per 100 workers

Safer than 16% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 86% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−17.4

2016→2021

Interstate Batteries of Green Bay injury rate improved

Interstate Batteries of Green Bay's TCR fell 17.4 from 17.4 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2020 at 26.5 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=17.4 · 2017=3.6 · 2018=4.3 · 2019=4.3 · 2020=26.5 · 2021=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 423120 · Appleton, WI ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 9.3 · 424% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #15/17
  • PHOTO Accessories of Chica…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 14 inj
  • SIZE ~29 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Accessories of Chicago - Neenah (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Wisconsin employers → · Look up another →

Interstate Batteries of Green Bay in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Interstate Batteries of Green Bay averages 9.3 TCR (424% of the Batteries, automotive, merchant wholesalers BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Interstate Batteries of Green Bay TCR series: 2016=17.4 · 2017=3.6 · 2018=4.3 · 2019=4.3 · 2020=26.5 · 2021=0 · BLS 2.2

Where Interstate Batteries of Green Bay falls in its industry

950 Batteries, automotive, merchan establishments

Safer than 16% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Wisconsin alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #15 safest of 17 Batteries, automotive, merchan employers in Wisconsin.

Interstate Batteries of Green Bay (29 employees, TCR 9.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 4.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Interstate Batteries of Green Bay
Interstate Batteries of Green Bay (29 employees, TCR 9.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 4.7

Interstate Batteries of Green Bay has fewer employees than the Batteries, automotive, merchant wholesal median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 26.5 8.8 6 0 0
2019 4.3 0.0 1 0 0
2018 4.3 4.3 1 0 0
2017 3.6 3.6 1 0 0
2016 17.4 6.9 5 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

423120 · WI · Appleton

950 Batteries, automotive, merchant wholesalers employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,834 rated employers in Wisconsin with headcount on file · 356 employers in Appleton, WI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Accessories of Chicago - Neenah 9.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR IMC Houston 9.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Parts Authority BC Linden 9.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR 002/ Sacramento 9.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Rhinelander Ag Research 29 FTE
STATE-SIZE Habelman Bros. Company - Millston 29 FTE
STATE-SIZE Evergreen Nursery Company, Inc. 29 FTE
STATE-SIZE Majestic View Dairy 29 FTE
CITY-NEAR ThedaCare Regional Medical Center Appleton 1,649 FTE
CITY-NEAR ThedaCare Regional Medical Center-Appleton 1,563 FTE
CITY-NEAR Northern Operations 1,321 FTE
CITY-NEAR Fox Valley Technical College (WI) 1,279 FTE
NAT-TCR EMS 9.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Bowden Properties LLC 9.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Pine Ridge Skilled Nursing & Rehab 9.3 TCR
NAT-TCR IPF 9.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE The Meadows Manor 29 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hilton Garden Inn - Dallas/Arlington 29 FTE
NAT-SIZE Southaven - Bound Tree 29 FTE
NAT-SIZE CWPMO, Inc dba College Works Painting 29 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.