Utility trailers manufacturing · Michigan

Interstate Manufacturing, Inc.

White Pigeon, MI · ~50 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
10.2
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Interstate Manufacturing, Inc. runs at 310% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Utility trailers manufacturing workplace, earning a grade F.

Interstate Manufacturing, Inc.: 10.2 TCR = 310% of Utility trailers manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Interstate Manufacturing, Inc. safety composite

Interstate Manufacturing, Inc. scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 88% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 25%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

53/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 10.23 per 100 workers

Safer than 25% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 88% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−4.0

2016→2024

Interstate Manufacturing, Inc. injury rate improved

Interstate Manufacturing, Inc.'s TCR fell 4.0 from 4.0 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 17.4 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=4.0 · 2017=9.1 · 2018=16.8 · 2019=10.3 · 2020=17.4 · 2021=16.7 · 2022=7.1 · 2023=10.6 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 336214 · White Pigeon, MI ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 10.2 · 310% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK P25
  • PHOTO HEARTLAND RVs IDAHO
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 40 inj
  • SIZE ~50 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: HEARTLAND RVs IDAHO (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

Interstate Manufacturing, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Interstate Manufacturing, Inc. averages 10.2 TCR (310% of the Utility trailers manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Interstate Manufacturing, Inc. TCR series: 2016=4 · 2017=9.1 · 2018=16.8 · 2019=10.3 · 2020=17.4 · 2021=16.7 · 2022=7.1 · 2023=10.6 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Interstate Manufacturing, Inc. falls in its industry

262 Utility trailers manufacturing establishments

Safer than 25% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers
Interstate Manufacturing, Inc. (50 employees, TCR 10.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 121 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,0002,500 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Interstate Manufacturing, Inc.
Interstate Manufacturing, Inc. (50 employees, TCR 10.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 121 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Interstate Manufacturing, Inc. has fewer employees than the Utility trailers manufacturing median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 10.6 3.5 3 0 0
2022 7.1 4.7 2 1 0
2021 16.7 8.4 6 2 0
2020 17.4 4.4 8 0 0
2019 10.3 2.1 5 0 0
2018 16.8 3.7 9 0 0
2017 9.1 7.3 5 0 0
2016 4.0 2.0 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

336214 · MI · White Pigeon

262 Utility trailers manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 12 employers in White Pigeon, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR HEARTLAND RVs IDAHO 10.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Hiker Industries LLC 10.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR CEDAR PLANT 10.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Dutchmen Plant 840 10.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Commonwealth Commerce Center 50 FTE
STATE-SIZE Gas Construction Midland 50 FTE
STATE-SIZE Tri-City Acoustical 50 FTE
STATE-SIZE 4066_7786 50 FTE
CITY-NEAR Merhow Acquisition LLC 154 FTE
CITY-NEAR White Pigeon Division 108 FTE
CITY-NEAR DECKORATORS INC 97 FTE
CITY-NEAR White Pigeon Paper Company 90 FTE
NAT-TCR Fresh Foods Manufacturing Company (W012) 10.2 TCR
NAT-TCR M.A.C. Complejo Deportivo Ing.Angel O. Berrios Diaz/Depto Recreacion y Deportes 14209 21 10.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Desert Steel, LLC 10.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Olive Hill Greenhouses - Olive Hill Road 10.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Medina Facility 50 FTE
NAT-SIZE To-Jo Food Products Inc. 50 FTE
NAT-SIZE Driver Pipeline Company, Inc. - Freeport, TX 50 FTE
NAT-SIZE CSA Constructors 50 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.