Gray iron foundries · Michigan

Waupaca Foundry - Plant 1 OS Michigan

Ironwood, MI · ~50 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
18.7
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Waupaca Foundry - Plant 1 OS Michigan runs at 566% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Gray iron foundries workplace, earning a grade F.

Waupaca Foundry - Plant 1 OS Michigan: 18.7 TCR = 566% of Gray iron foundries BLS 3.3 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Waupaca Foundry - Plant 1 OS Michigan safety composite

Waupaca Foundry - Plant 1 OS Michigan scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 94% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 10%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

50/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 18.68 per 100 workers

Safer than 10% of industry peers

DART rate
A 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 94% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−13.1

2019→2024

Waupaca Foundry - Plant 1 OS Michigan injury rate improved

Waupaca Foundry - Plant 1 OS Michigan's TCR fell 13.1 from 16.9 in 2019 to 3.7 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 25.9 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2019=16.9 · 2020=22.3 · 2021=20.0 · 2022=25.9 · 2023=23.4 · 2024=3.7

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 331511 · Ironwood, MI ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 18.7 · 566% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #24/25
  • PHOTO Mid-City Foundry Co.…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 41 inj
  • SIZE ~50 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Mid-City Foundry Co. - Milwaukee Division (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

Waupaca Foundry - Plant 1 OS Michigan in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Waupaca Foundry - Plant 1 OS Michigan averages 18.7 TCR (566% of the Gray iron foundries BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Waupaca Foundry - Plant 1 OS Michigan TCR series: 2019=16.9 · 2020=22.3 · 2021=20 · 2022=25.9 · 2023=23.4 · 2024=3.7 · BLS 3.3

Where Waupaca Foundry - Plant 1 OS Michigan falls in its industry

272 Gray iron foundries establishments

Safer than 10% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #24 safest of 25 Gray iron foundries employers in Michigan.

Waupaca Foundry - Plant 1 OS Michigan (50 employees, TCR 18.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 112 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Waupaca Foundry - Plant 1 OS Michigan
Waupaca Foundry - Plant 1 OS Michigan (50 employees, TCR 18.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 112 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Waupaca Foundry - Plant 1 OS Michigan has fewer employees than the Gray iron foundries median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 3.7 0.0 0 1 0
2023 23.4 17.0 6 5 0
2022 25.9 22.6 16 0 0
2021 20.0 10.0 9 3 0
2020 22.3 11.1 8 0 0
2019 16.9 16.9 2 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

331511 · MI · Ironwood

272 Gray iron foundries employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 15 employers in Ironwood, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Mid-City Foundry Co. - Milwaukee Division 18.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Donsco Inc Mount Joy Foundry 18.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Russelloy Iron Foundry, LLC 19.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Prospect Foundry LLC 19.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Commonwealth Commerce Center 50 FTE
STATE-SIZE Gas Construction Midland 50 FTE
STATE-SIZE Tri-City Acoustical 50 FTE
STATE-SIZE 4066_7786 50 FTE
CITY-NEAR Aspirus Ironwood Hospital 267 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 5444 242 FTE
CITY-NEAR Apirus Ironwood Hospital 220 FTE
CITY-NEAR 5444 219 FTE
NAT-TCR Genet St 18.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Trader Joe's 0454 Austin 18.7 TCR
NAT-TCR East Haven Public Services 18.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Jan-Ground Ops 18.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Welding Accessories and Cutting - Watertown 50 FTE
NAT-SIZE Branch #8 Springfield 50 FTE
NAT-SIZE Alliance ISE Lakeland 50 FTE
NAT-SIZE RLS Fulfillment Salt Lake City 50 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.