Pipeline construction on oil and gas field gathering lines to point of distribution on a contract basis · Texas
Interstate Pipeline Utility Construction
Dallas, TX · ~93 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.
- A
- Excellent Safety Record
- 1.3
- Avg TCR
- 2.8
- Industry avg
- 0
- Fatalities
The verdict
Interstate Pipeline Utility Construction runs at 47% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Pipeline construction on oil and gas field gathering lines to point of distribution on a contract basis workplace, earning a grade A.
Interstate Pipeline Utility Construction: 1.3 TCR = 47% of Pipeline construction on oil and gas field gathering lines to point of distribution on a contract basis BLS 2.8 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)
Interstate Pipeline Utility Construction safety composite
Interstate Pipeline Utility Construction scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 70% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 29%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).
49/100
Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures
- Total Case Rate (TCR)
- F 1.32 per 100 workers
Safer than 29% of industry peers
- DART rate
- C 0 per 100 workers
Safer than 70% of industry peers
- Fatalities
- D 0
Safer than 52% of industry peers
Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).
TCR Δ
−4.5
2017→2024
Interstate Pipeline Utility Construction injury rate improved
Interstate Pipeline Utility Construction's TCR fell 4.5 from 4.5 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2017 at 4.5 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).
2017=4.5 · 2018=1.6 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=2.1 · 2021=0.9 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=1.5 · 2024=0.0
OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard
Establishment book 237120 · Dallas, TX AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL
Grade A · TCR 1.3 · 47% of ind
- DART 0.0 DART
- RANK #192/216
- PHOTO Henkels & McCoy, New…
- BOOK 8y book
- INJ 8 inj
- SIZE ~93 FTE
Nearest TCR peer: Henkels & McCoy, New Jersey - Burlington (0.0 TCR gap)
Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →
Interstate Pipeline Utility Construction in the TCR neighbourhood
Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers
- This site
Interstate Pipeline Utility Construction
1.3 TCR
- Henkels & McCo
Henkels & McCoy, New Jersey - Burlington
1.3 TCR
- SEIFERT WELDIN
SEIFERT WELDING
1.3 TCR
- JS Rae - Berks
JS Rae - Berkshire
1.3 TCR
- 104012 - NGL-F
104012 - NGL-Fields Point LNG Facility
1.3 TCR
What this shows Interstate Pipeline Utility Construction averages 1.3 TCR (47% of the Pipeline construction on oil and gas field gathering lines to point of distribution on a contract basis BLS benchmark).
Interstate Pipeline Utility Construction TCR series: 2017=4.5 · 2018=1.6 · 2019=0 · 2020=2.1 · 2021=0.9 · 2022=0 · 2023=1.5 · 2024=0 · BLS 2.8
Where Interstate Pipeline Utility Construction falls in its industry
809 Pipeline construction on oil a establishmentsSafer than 29% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 0.7.
Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #192 safest of 216 Pipeline construction on oil a employers in Texas.
Interstate Pipeline Utility Construction has fewer employees than the Pipeline construction on oil and gas fie median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 0.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.
Year-by-Year Safety Data
| Year | TCR | DART | Injuries | Illnesses | Fatalities |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 2023 | 1.5 | 0.7 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| 2022 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 2021 | 0.9 | 0.0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| 2020 | 2.1 | 1.1 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| 2019 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 2018 | 1.6 | 1.6 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| 2017 | 4.5 | 0.0 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
OSHA ITA peer cross-reference
Establishment peer ledger
237120 · TX · Dallas
809 Pipeline construction on oil and gas field gathering lines to point of distribution on a contract basis employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 2,187 employers in Dallas, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.
| Rel | Establishment | Metric |
|---|---|---|
| NAICS-TCR | Henkels & McCoy, New Jersey - Burlington | 1.3 TCR |
| NAICS-TCR | SEIFERT WELDING | 1.3 TCR |
| NAICS-TCR | JS Rae - Berkshire | 1.3 TCR |
| NAICS-TCR | 104012 - NGL-Fields Point LNG Facility | 1.3 TCR |
| STATE-SIZE | Apache Corporation - Houston Region | 93 FTE |
| STATE-SIZE | Strata Material, LLC. Dba Acrosa Crushed Concrete | 93 FTE |
| STATE-SIZE | Spring Branch Service Center CPC4 | 93 FTE |
| STATE-SIZE | HARLINGEN TX OF | 93 FTE |
| CITY-NEAR | AECOM DCS (US Operations) | 15,100 FTE |
| CITY-NEAR | Rexel USA, Inc | 8,356 FTE |
| CITY-NEAR | 1 CHILDRENS MEDICAL CENTER OF DALLAS | 6,147 FTE |
| CITY-NEAR | HDQ - Headquarters | 5,764 FTE |
| NAT-TCR | Hunter Douglas | 1.3 TCR |
| NAT-TCR | WAVE Aberdeen | 1.3 TCR |
| NAT-TCR | S03463 - Van Buren Hauling and Transfer | 1.3 TCR |
| NAT-TCR | Performance Sealing Inc. | 1.3 TCR |
| NAT-SIZE | Machine Concepts Inc | 93 FTE |
| NAT-SIZE | Keefe Group Fontana | 93 FTE |
| NAT-SIZE | Bear Electrical Solutions, LLC | 93 FTE |
| NAT-SIZE | City of Meriden Fire Department Engine #1 | 93 FTE |
Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →
Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.