Distribution line, gas and oil, construction · New Jersey

Henkels & McCoy, New Jersey - Burlington

Burlington, NJ · ~104 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.3
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Henkels & McCoy, New Jersey - Burlington runs at 47% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Distribution line, gas and oil, construction workplace, earning a grade A.

Henkels & McCoy, New Jersey - Burlington: 1.3 TCR = 47% of Distribution line, gas and oil, construction BLS 2.8 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Henkels & McCoy, New Jersey - Burlington safety composite

Henkels & McCoy, New Jersey - Burlington scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 70% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 29%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

49/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 1.32 per 100 workers

Safer than 29% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 70% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.1

2016→2024

Henkels & McCoy, New Jersey - Burlington injury rate improved

Henkels & McCoy, New Jersey - Burlington's TCR fell 2.1 from 2.1 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2016 at 2.1 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=2.1 · 2017=1.9 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 237120 · Burlington, NJ AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 1.3 · 47% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #6/18
  • PHOTO Interstate Pipeline …
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 4 inj
  • SIZE ~104 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Interstate Pipeline Utility Construction (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New Jersey employers → · Look up another →

Henkels & McCoy, New Jersey - Burlington in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Henkels & McCoy, New Jersey - Burlington averages 1.3 TCR (47% of the Distribution line, gas and oil, construction BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Henkels & McCoy, New Jersey - Burlington TCR series: 2016=2.1 · 2017=1.9 · 2024=0 · BLS 2.8

Where Henkels & McCoy, New Jersey - Burlington falls in its industry

809 Distribution line, gas and oil establishments

Safer than 29% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 0.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New Jersey alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #6 safest of 18 Distribution line, gas and oil employers in New Jersey.

Henkels & McCoy, New Jersey - Burlington (104 employees, TCR 1.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 137 employees and a TCR of 0.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,000 01234 Average employees Total Case Rate Henkels & McCoy, New Jersey - Burlington
Henkels & McCoy, New Jersey - Burlington (104 employees, TCR 1.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 137 employees and a TCR of 0.7

Henkels & McCoy, New Jersey - Burlington has fewer employees than the Distribution line, gas and oil, construc median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 0.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 1.9 1.9 2 0 0
2016 2.1 2.1 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

237120 · NJ · Burlington

809 Distribution line, gas and oil, construction employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 11,201 rated employers in New Jersey with headcount on file · 101 employers in Burlington, NJ · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Interstate Pipeline Utility Construction 1.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR SEIFERT WELDING 1.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR JS Rae - Berkshire 1.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR 104012 - NGL-Fields Point LNG Facility 1.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Fred M. Schiavone Construction, Inc. 104 FTE
STATE-SIZE VRH Construction Corp. 104 FTE
STATE-SIZE Spectraserv Inc. 104 FTE
STATE-SIZE LANTIER CONSTRUCTION CO. 104 FTE
CITY-NEAR COMPASSIONATE CARE HOSPICE GROUP LTD. 1,470 FTE
CITY-NEAR North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : ACY2 1,426 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - ACY2 1,055 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - ACY8 658 FTE
NAT-TCR Brembo North America - Disc Facility 1.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Augusta Distribution 1.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Sundance Press 1.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Vita-Mix Corporation - Morgan Court 1.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Harrison's Crossing Health Campus 104 FTE
NAT-SIZE Oakwood Health Campus 104 FTE
NAT-SIZE River Pointe Health Campus 104 FTE
NAT-SIZE Chicago 104 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.