Industrial machinery and equipment (except electrical) merchant wholesalers · Minnesota

Interstate Power Systems Inc.

Minneapolis, MN · ~958 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
2.1
Avg TCR
2.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Interstate Power Systems Inc. runs at 95% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Industrial machinery and equipment (except electrical) merchant wholesalers workplace, earning a grade C.

Interstate Power Systems Inc.: 2.1 TCR = 95% of Industrial machinery and equipment (except electrical) merchant wholesalers BLS 2.2 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Interstate Power Systems Inc. safety composite

Interstate Power Systems Inc. scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 58% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 39%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

50/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.08 per 100 workers

Safer than 58% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.39 per 100 workers

Safer than 39% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Interstate Power Systems Inc.: 1.9 → 2.3 TCR

Peak year 2019 @ 2.3 TCR · DART/TCR 0.67× in 2019

Interstate Power Systems Inc.'s TCR rose 0.5 from 1.9 in 2018 to 2.3 in 2019. In 2019, DART was 0.67× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 423830 · Minneapolis, MN AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 2.1 · 95% of ind

  • DART 1.4 DART
  • RANK #7/16
  • PHOTO Beard Equipment Comp…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 40 inj
  • SIZE ~958 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Beard Equipment Company of Mobile (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Interstate Power Systems Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Interstate Power Systems Inc. averages 2.1 TCR (95% of the Industrial machinery and equipment (except electrical) merchant wholesalers BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Interstate Power Systems Inc. TCR series: 2018=1.9 · 2019=2.3 · BLS 2.2

Where Interstate Power Systems Inc. falls in its industry

911 Industrial machinery and equip establishments

Safer than 58% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #7 safest of 16 Industrial machinery and equip employers in Minnesota.

Interstate Power Systems Inc. (958 employees, TCR 2.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 2.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 02468 Average employees Total Case Rate Interstate Power Systems Inc.
Interstate Power Systems Inc. (958 employees, TCR 2.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 2.5

Interstate Power Systems Inc. has more employees than the Industrial machinery and equipment (exce median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 2.3 1.4 20 0 0
2018 1.9 0.7 20 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

423830 · MN · Minneapolis

911 Industrial machinery and equipment (except electrical) merchant wholesalers employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 1,321 employers in Minneapolis, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Beard Equipment Company of Mobile 2.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR 06018-06-06-SALINAS 2.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR PSI Atlanta 2.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR CARL ERIC JOHNSON INC 2.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE 6458-STPL 957 FTE
STATE-SIZE R & D Systems inc. 961 FTE
STATE-SIZE Egan Company 962 FTE
STATE-SIZE Forensics 954 FTE
CITY-NEAR University of Minnesota Twin Cities 22,522 FTE
CITY-NEAR MN950 MN TELECOMMUTER 12,021 FTE
CITY-NEAR 0501 - City Center 8,459 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hennepin County Medical Center 7,030 FTE
NAT-TCR Ryder Fruitland ID. 2.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Green Tree 2.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Mundy Maintenance, Services and Operations LLC Job #32311 2.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Shopko Hometown #613 (Winneconne, WI) 2.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Discovery Cove 958 FTE
NAT-SIZE Titan Global Investigations LLC 958 FTE
NAT-SIZE Millstone Nuc 958 FTE
NAT-SIZE General Mills - Wellston 958 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.