Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · California

Carmel Village Memory Care

Clovis, CA · ~35 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
19.5
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Carmel Village Memory Care runs at 513% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Carmel Village Memory Care: 19.5 TCR = 513% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Carmel Village Memory Care safety composite

Carmel Village Memory Care scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 55% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 5%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

34/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 19.5 per 100 workers

Safer than 5% of industry peers

DART rate
C 2.7 per 100 workers

Safer than 55% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−9.2

2016→2018

Carmel Village Memory Care injury rate improved

Carmel Village Memory Care's TCR fell 9.2 from 20.0 in 2016 to 10.8 in 2018. Peak filing year was 2017 at 27.7 TCR. In 2018, DART was 0.14× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=20.0 · 2017=27.7 · 2018=10.8

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Clovis, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 19.5 · 513% of ind

  • DART 2.7 DART
  • RANK #572/635
  • PHOTO OC AL MC Care Proper…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 13 inj
  • SIZE ~35 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: OC AL MC Care Properties, LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Carmel Village Memory Care in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Carmel Village Memory Care averages 19.5 TCR (513% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Carmel Village Memory Care TCR series: 2016=20 · 2017=27.7 · 2018=10.8 · BLS 3.8

Where Carmel Village Memory Care falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 5% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #572 safest of 635 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in California.

Carmel Village Memory Care (35 employees, TCR 19.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Carmel Village Memory Care
Carmel Village Memory Care (35 employees, TCR 19.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Carmel Village Memory Care has fewer employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2018 10.8 2.7 4 0 0
2017 27.7 27.7 8 0 0
2016 20.0 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · CA · Clovis

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 125 employers in Clovis, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR OC AL MC Care Properties, LLC 19.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Clifton Assisted Living 19.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Cadence at Rancho Cucamonga 19.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR The Inn on Villa Lane 19.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE CONSTRUCTION FABRICATION/CARPENTRY/PAINTING/ELECTRIC/PIPE 35 FTE
STATE-SIZE Meek Ranches LLC 35 FTE
STATE-SIZE Dresick Farms, Inc. - Farm 35 FTE
STATE-SIZE Wolfsen Inc 35 FTE
CITY-NEAR Clovis Community Medical Ctr 2,643 FTE
CITY-NEAR Alorica - Clovis 687 FTE
CITY-NEAR City of Clovis 668 FTE
CITY-NEAR Enhanced Landscape Management 510 FTE
NAT-TCR Frattallone's Ace Hardware-Minnetonka 19.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Grant Center 19.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Madison County Detention Home 19.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Clifton Assisted Living 19.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE William T. Cantrell, Inc. 35 FTE
NAT-SIZE Promised Land Texas 35 FTE
NAT-SIZE The Fountains at Godfrey 35 FTE
NAT-SIZE Courtyard St Petersburg/Clearwater 35 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.