Alternative energy (e.g., geothermal, ocean wave, solar, wind) structure construction · Texas

Isbell Construction, LTD.

Florence, TX · ~102 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.2
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Isbell Construction, LTD. runs at 7% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Alternative energy (e.g., geothermal, ocean wave, solar, wind) structure construction workplace, earning a grade A.

Isbell Construction, LTD.: 0.2 TCR = 7% of Alternative energy (e.g., geothermal, ocean wave, solar, wind) structure construction BLS 2.8 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Isbell Construction, LTD. safety composite

Isbell Construction, LTD. scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 97% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 37%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

65/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.2 per 100 workers

Safer than 97% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.21 per 100 workers

Safer than 37% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Isbell Construction, LTD.: 0.0 → 1.2 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 1.2 TCR · DART/TCR 6.05× in 2024

Isbell Construction, LTD.'s TCR rose 1.2 from 0.0 in 2019 to 1.2 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 6.05× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 237130 · Florence, TX AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 0.2 · 7% of ind

  • DART 1.2 DART
  • RANK #10/161
  • PHOTO ITC Operations-119
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~102 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: ITC Operations-119 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Isbell Construction, LTD. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Isbell Construction, LTD. averages 0.2 TCR (7% of the Alternative energy (e.g., geothermal, ocean wave, solar, wind) structure construction BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Isbell Construction, LTD. TCR series: 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=1.2 · BLS 2.8

Where Isbell Construction, LTD. falls in its industry

1,605 Alternative energy (e.g., geot establishments

Safer than 97% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #10 safest of 161 Alternative energy (e.g., geot employers in Texas.

Isbell Construction, LTD. (102 employees, TCR 0.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 74 employees and a TCR of 2.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Isbell Construction, LTD.
Isbell Construction, LTD. (102 employees, TCR 0.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 74 employees and a TCR of 2.0

Isbell Construction, LTD. has more employees than the Alternative energy (e.g., geothermal, oc median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.2 1.2 1 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

237130 · TX · Florence

1,605 Alternative energy (e.g., geothermal, ocean wave, solar, wind) structure construction employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 4 employers in Florence, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR ITC Operations-119 0.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR M.G. Dyess 0.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR DEPCOM Power Sottsdale 0.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Casey Industrial Corp. 0.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Tier 1 Completions Solutions 102 FTE
STATE-SIZE Midland Yard 102 FTE
STATE-SIZE Denver City 102 FTE
STATE-SIZE CenterPoint Energy - Baytown Service Center 102 FTE
CITY-NEAR Staccato 2011 LLC 223 FTE
CITY-NEAR Florence Mill 31 FTE
CITY-NEAR Tex- Mix Florence 21 FTE
NAT-TCR WORLD electronics sales and service 0.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Lightsource bp - Denver Office 0.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Dodge Industrial 0.2 TCR
NAT-TCR California Department of Transportation Facility 359 0.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Wilbraham 102 FTE
NAT-SIZE California Fresh Market - SLO 102 FTE
NAT-SIZE Feintool Cincinnati Inc. Grooms Rd. 102 FTE
NAT-SIZE A American Electric 102 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.