Scheduled Passenger Air Transportation · Texas

4795-Pd-Sat-San Antonio-Pd

San Antonio, TX · ~102 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
13.6
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

4795-Pd-Sat-San Antonio-Pd runs at 301% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Scheduled Passenger Air Transportation workplace, earning a grade F.

4795-Pd-Sat-San Antonio-Pd: 13.6 TCR = 301% of Scheduled Passenger Air Transportation BLS 4.5 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

4795-Pd-Sat-San Antonio-Pd safety composite

4795-Pd-Sat-San Antonio-Pd scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 13%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

23/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 13.55 per 100 workers

Safer than 16% of industry peers

DART rate
F 13.56 per 100 workers

Safer than 13% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

4795-Pd-Sat-San Antonio-Pd: 8.1 → 19.0 TCR

Peak year 2018 @ 19.0 TCR · DART/TCR 1× in 2018

4795-Pd-Sat-San Antonio-Pd's TCR rose 10.9 from 8.1 in 2016 to 19.0 in 2018. In 2018, DART was 1× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 481111 · San Antonio, TX ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 13.6 · 301% of ind

  • DART 13.6 DART
  • RANK #128/146
  • PHOTO TUS - Ground Ops
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 15 inj
  • SIZE ~102 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: TUS - Ground Ops (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

4795-Pd-Sat-San Antonio-Pd in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows 4795-Pd-Sat-San Antonio-Pd averages 13.6 TCR (301% of the Scheduled Passenger Air Transportation BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

4795-Pd-Sat-San Antonio-Pd TCR series: 2016=8.1 · 2017=13.6 · 2018=19 · BLS 4.5

Where 4795-Pd-Sat-San Antonio-Pd falls in its industry

1,568 Scheduled Passenger Air Transp establishments

Safer than 16% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #128 safest of 146 Scheduled Passenger Air Transp employers in Texas.

4795-Pd-Sat-San Antonio-Pd (102 employees, TCR 13.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 102 employees and a TCR of 6.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,000 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate 4795-Pd-Sat-San Antonio-Pd
4795-Pd-Sat-San Antonio-Pd (102 employees, TCR 13.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 102 employees and a TCR of 6.1

4795-Pd-Sat-San Antonio-Pd has more employees than the Scheduled Passenger Air Transportation median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2018 19.0 13.6 7 0 0
2017 13.6 8.2 5 0 0
2016 8.1 5.4 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

481111 · TX · San Antonio

1,568 Scheduled Passenger Air Transportation employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 2,207 employers in San Antonio, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR TUS - Ground Ops 13.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR SAT-SAN ANTONIO 13.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Aeropuerto Jose Aponte de la Torre 13.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR 2073-SW-20730092-CS 13.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Tier 1 Completions Solutions 102 FTE
STATE-SIZE Midland Yard 102 FTE
STATE-SIZE Denver City 102 FTE
STATE-SIZE CenterPoint Energy - Baytown Service Center 102 FTE
CITY-NEAR Bexar County Hospital District 8,703 FTE
CITY-NEAR Legend Oaks Health & Rehabilitation West San Antonio 6,953 FTE
CITY-NEAR ISS Facility Services Inc. 6,177 FTE
CITY-NEAR Buena Vida of San Antonio 5,262 FTE
NAT-TCR Fair Oaks Rehabilitation & Health Care Center 13.6 TCR
NAT-TCR WA100 13.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Berkeley - Sacramento 13.6 TCR
NAT-TCR State of Tennessee Department of General Services - Warehouse 13.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE 2073-EJ-20730171-FO 102 FTE
NAT-SIZE Penske : 4383-00 GM-CCA/Flint, MI 102 FTE
NAT-SIZE Southern GMC Kia - Greenbrier 102 FTE
NAT-SIZE Allied Building Stores - Monroe Office 102 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.