Elementary and secondary schools · Minnesota

ISD 191 Edward Neill Elementary

Burnsville, MN · ~61 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
2.0
Avg TCR
1.4
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

ISD 191 Edward Neill Elementary runs at 145% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Elementary and secondary schools workplace, earning a grade D.

ISD 191 Edward Neill Elementary: 2.0 TCR = 145% of Elementary and secondary schools BLS 1.4 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

ISD 191 Edward Neill Elementary safety composite

ISD 191 Edward Neill Elementary scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 77% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 31%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

54/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 2.03 per 100 workers

Safer than 77% of industry peers

DART rate
F 2.5 per 100 workers

Safer than 31% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

ISD 191 Edward Neill Elementary held a steady TCR band

ISD 191 Edward Neill Elementary's TCR held near 0.2 from 2.3 in 2017 to 2.5 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2018 at 4.9 TCR. In 2022, DART was 1.23× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=2.3 · 2018=4.9 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=2.4 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=2.5

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 611110 · Burnsville, MN ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 2.0 · 145% of ind

  • DART 2.5 DART
  • RANK #395/1589
  • PHOTO Secondary
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 5 inj
  • SIZE ~61 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Secondary (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

ISD 191 Edward Neill Elementary in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows ISD 191 Edward Neill Elementary averages 2.0 TCR (145% of the Elementary and secondary schools BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

ISD 191 Edward Neill Elementary TCR series: 2017=2.3 · 2018=4.9 · 2019=0 · 2020=2.4 · 2021=0 · 2022=2.5 · BLS 1.4

Where ISD 191 Edward Neill Elementary falls in its industry

3,374 Elementary and secondary schoo establishments

Safer than 77% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #395 safest of 1589 Elementary and secondary schoo employers in Minnesota.

ISD 191 Edward Neill Elementary (61 employees, TCR 2.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 76 employees and a TCR of 3.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02,0004,0006,0008,00010,000 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate ISD 191 Edward Neill Elementary
ISD 191 Edward Neill Elementary (61 employees, TCR 2.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 76 employees and a TCR of 3.8

ISD 191 Edward Neill Elementary has fewer employees than the Elementary and secondary schools median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 2.5 2.5 1 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 2.4 2.4 1 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 4.9 0.0 2 0 0
2017 2.3 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

611110 · MN · Burnsville

3,374 Elementary and secondary schools employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 243 employers in Burnsville, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Secondary 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR 12-Lakeview Elementary 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Centennial High School 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Vandalia CUSD #203 2.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Gittleman Construction and Maintenance 61 FTE
STATE-SIZE R and G Construction Co. 61 FTE
STATE-SIZE BLK ELECTRIC 61 FTE
STATE-SIZE Cresco Food Technologies 61 FTE
CITY-NEAR Ames Construction 2,318 FTE
CITY-NEAR Rosemount Aerospace Inc (Burnsville MN) 1,894 FTE
CITY-NEAR ROSEMOUNT AEROSPACE INC_6830 1,861 FTE
CITY-NEAR Goodrich - Sensors and Integrated Systems- Burnsville MN 1,673 FTE
NAT-TCR IPS Packaging 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR PSSI - 0461 The Schwan Food Company - Pasadena 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Noosa Pest Management 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Greif Lockport 2.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE 1855-AHSCM14 61 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sanofi Reno Distribution Center 61 FTE
NAT-SIZE 6400-SWY-0005-0005-02462 61 FTE
NAT-SIZE 336390-Parsippany Po 61 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.