The manufacturing of aeronautical detection systems and instruments · Minnesota

Rosemount Aerospace Inc_6830

Burnsville, MN · ~1,861 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.4
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Rosemount Aerospace Inc_6830 runs at 12% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical The manufacturing of aeronautical detection systems and instruments workplace, earning a grade A.

Rosemount Aerospace Inc_6830: 0.4 TCR = 12% of The manufacturing of aeronautical detection systems and instruments BLS 3.3 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Rosemount Aerospace Inc_6830 safety composite

Rosemount Aerospace Inc_6830 scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 70% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 49%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

58/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 0.41 per 100 workers

Safer than 70% of industry peers

DART rate
D 0.05 per 100 workers

Safer than 49% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.4

2019→2020

Rosemount Aerospace Inc_6830 injury rate improved

Rosemount Aerospace Inc_6830's TCR fell 0.4 from 0.6 in 2019 to 0.2 in 2020. Peak filing year was 2019 at 0.6 TCR. In 2020, DART was 0.12× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2019=0.6 · 2020=0.2

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 334511 · Burnsville, MN AT/BELOW-IND · LARGE

Grade A · TCR 0.4 · 12% of ind

  • DART 0.1 DART
  • RANK #3/8
  • PHOTO Raytheon_El Segundo_CA
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 17 inj
  • SIZE ~1,861 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Raytheon_El Segundo_CA (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Rosemount Aerospace Inc_6830 in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Rosemount Aerospace Inc_6830 averages 0.4 TCR (12% of the The manufacturing of aeronautical detection systems and instruments BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Rosemount Aerospace Inc_6830 TCR series: 2019=0.6 · 2020=0.2 · BLS 3.3

Where Rosemount Aerospace Inc_6830 falls in its industry

388 The manufacturing of aeronauti establishments

Safer than 70% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 0.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #3 safest of 8 The manufacturing of aeronauti employers in Minnesota.

Rosemount Aerospace Inc_6830 (1,861 employees, TCR 0.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 207 employees and a TCR of 0.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Rosemount Aerospace Inc_6830
Rosemount Aerospace Inc_6830 (1,861 employees, TCR 0.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 207 employees and a TCR of 0.7

Rosemount Aerospace Inc_6830 has more employees than the The manufacturing of aeronautical detect median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 0.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 0.2 0.1 4 0 0
2019 0.6 0.3 13 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

334511 · MN · Burnsville

388 The manufacturing of aeronautical detection systems and instruments employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 243 employers in Burnsville, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Raytheon_El Segundo_CA 0.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR L3 Technologies Inc. 0.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR L3Harris Aviation Products 0.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Rockwell Collins (Bellevue) 0.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE 2573-MN008 1,873 FTE
STATE-SIZE Building D-Miller Dwan Medical Center 1,880 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hormel Foods - Austin Plant 1,884 FTE
STATE-SIZE Rosemount Aerospace Inc (Burnsville MN) 1,894 FTE
CITY-NEAR Ames Construction 2,318 FTE
CITY-NEAR Goodrich - Sensors and Integrated Systems- Burnsville MN 1,673 FTE
CITY-NEAR FV Ridges Hospital 1,588 FTE
CITY-NEAR BURNSVILLE MN 555 FTE
NAT-TCR Needham Corporate HQ 1519 0.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Engineered Films Plant--Bldg 18 0.4 TCR
NAT-TCR ARE - Greater Boston Region 0.4 TCR
NAT-TCR American Girl Chicago 0.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Wyoming Department of Transportation 1,861 FTE
NAT-SIZE 4701-V720P 1,860 FTE
NAT-SIZE Amazon.com Services LLC - SCK6 1,862 FTE
NAT-SIZE St. Vincent Healthcare 1,860 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.