Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · Texas

Isle at Watercrest Dominion

San Antonio, TX · ~36 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
12.0
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Isle at Watercrest Dominion runs at 315% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Isle at Watercrest Dominion: 12.0 TCR = 315% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Isle at Watercrest Dominion safety composite

Isle at Watercrest Dominion scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 57% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 21%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

41/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 11.98 per 100 workers

Safer than 21% of industry peers

DART rate
C 2.49 per 100 workers

Safer than 57% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−9.0

2017→2018

Isle at Watercrest Dominion injury rate improved

Isle at Watercrest Dominion's TCR fell 9.0 from 16.5 in 2017 to 7.5 in 2018. Peak filing year was 2017 at 16.5 TCR. In 2018, DART was 0.21× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=16.5 · 2018=7.5

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · San Antonio, TX ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 12.0 · 315% of ind

  • DART 2.5 DART
  • RANK #392/470
  • PHOTO SRC of Arizona, LLC
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 6 inj
  • SIZE ~36 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: SRC of Arizona, LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Isle at Watercrest Dominion in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Isle at Watercrest Dominion averages 12.0 TCR (315% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Isle at Watercrest Dominion TCR series: 2017=16.5 · 2018=7.5 · BLS 3.8

Where Isle at Watercrest Dominion falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 21% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #392 safest of 470 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Texas.

Isle at Watercrest Dominion (36 employees, TCR 12.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Isle at Watercrest Dominion
Isle at Watercrest Dominion (36 employees, TCR 12.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Isle at Watercrest Dominion has fewer employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2018 7.5 2.5 2 1 0
2017 16.5 16.5 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · TX · San Antonio

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 2,207 employers in San Antonio, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR SRC of Arizona, LLC 12.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Merrill Gardens at West Covina 12.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR The Cambridge 12.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Parsons House Frisco 12.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE FRONTIER FEED YARD 36 FTE
STATE-SIZE Paco Feedyard 36 FTE
STATE-SIZE Coyote Lake Feedyard Inc. 36 FTE
STATE-SIZE Unlimited Contract Services Waelder 36 FTE
CITY-NEAR Bexar County Hospital District 8,703 FTE
CITY-NEAR Legend Oaks Health & Rehabilitation West San Antonio 6,953 FTE
CITY-NEAR ISS Facility Services Inc. 6,177 FTE
CITY-NEAR Buena Vida of San Antonio 5,262 FTE
NAT-TCR CNH_Fargo 12.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Trig's Everest Metro 12.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Imerys Fused Minerals Niagara Falls, Inc. 12.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Trinity Construction Products, Inc. 12.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Painted Post Center (Nyppd) 36 FTE
NAT-SIZE Red Oak Package Center (Iareo) 36 FTE
NAT-SIZE Pueblo West Emergency Depsrtment 36 FTE
NAT-SIZE Giant Eagle #3005 36 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.