Concrete reinforcing bar (rebar) assemblies, fabrication · Florida

Trinity Construction Products, Inc.

Apopka, FL · ~59 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
12.0
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
1
Fatality
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Trinity Construction Products, Inc. runs at 363% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Concrete reinforcing bar (rebar) assemblies, fabrication workplace, earning a grade F.

Trinity Construction Products, Inc.: 12.0 TCR = 363% of Concrete reinforcing bar (rebar) assemblies, fabrication BLS 3.3 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Trinity Construction Products, Inc. safety composite

Trinity Construction Products, Inc. scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 1%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

22/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 11.98 per 100 workers

Safer than 9% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.6 per 100 workers

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Fatalities
F 1

Safer than 1% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−8.8

2016→2018

Trinity Construction Products, Inc. injury rate improved

Trinity Construction Products, Inc.'s TCR fell 8.8 from 15.2 in 2016 to 6.4 in 2018. Peak filing year was 2016 at 15.2 TCR. In 2018, DART was 0.13× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=15.2 · 2017=14.4 · 2018=6.4

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332312 · Apopka, FL ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 12.0 · 363% of ind

  • DART 1.6 DART
  • RANK #54/56
  • PHOTO Structured Steel Pro…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 22 inj
  • SIZE ~59 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Structured Steel Products Corporation (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Florida employers → · Look up another →

Trinity Construction Products, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Trinity Construction Products, Inc. averages 12.0 TCR (363% of the Concrete reinforcing bar (rebar) assemblies, fabrication BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Trinity Construction Products, Inc. TCR series: 2016=15.2 · 2017=14.4 · 2018=6.4 · BLS 3.3

Where Trinity Construction Products, Inc. falls in its industry

1,491 Concrete reinforcing bar (reba establishments

Safer than 9% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Florida alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #54 safest of 56 Concrete reinforcing bar (reba employers in Florida.

Trinity Construction Products, Inc. (59 employees, TCR 12.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 54 employees and a TCR of 4.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Trinity Construction Products, Inc.
Trinity Construction Products, Inc. (59 employees, TCR 12.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 54 employees and a TCR of 4.6

Trinity Construction Products, Inc. has more employees than the Concrete reinforcing bar (rebar) assembl median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2018 6.4 1.6 4 0 0
2017 14.4 5.8 10 0 1
2016 15.2 1.5 8 2 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332312 · FL · Apopka

1,491 Concrete reinforcing bar (rebar) assemblies, fabrication employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 26,569 rated employers in Florida with headcount on file · 119 employers in Apopka, FL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Structured Steel Products Corporation 11.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR LCI - 084 11.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR ALAFAB 12.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR A & S Fabricating Co. 11.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE 2406-Felda, FL (Monsanto Co.) 59 FTE
STATE-SIZE Emerald Packing Company LLC 59 FTE
STATE-SIZE PTF Plant Turkey Point 59 FTE
STATE-SIZE Winter Haven Service Area 59 FTE
CITY-NEAR AdventHealth Apopka 820 FTE
CITY-NEAR FINFROCK DMC 768 FTE
CITY-NEAR Randall Mechanical Inc 603 FTE
CITY-NEAR FINFROCK 470 FTE
NAT-TCR Imerys Fused Minerals Niagara Falls, Inc. 12.0 TCR
NAT-TCR CNH_Fargo 12.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Trig's Everest Metro 12.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Mercy LIFE of Massachussetts 12.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE PCTNA 59 FTE
NAT-SIZE Pendleton Mill 59 FTE
NAT-SIZE South Point 59 FTE
NAT-SIZE Management of Transportation Services, Inc 59 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.