Building cleaning services, janitorial · Oklahoma

ISS Facility Services, Hewlett Packard Tulsa

Tulsa, OK · ~35 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
7.4
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

ISS Facility Services, Hewlett Packard Tulsa runs at 164% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Building cleaning services, janitorial workplace, earning a grade D.

ISS Facility Services, Hewlett Packard Tulsa: 7.4 TCR = 164% of Building cleaning services, janitorial BLS 4.5 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

ISS Facility Services, Hewlett Packard Tulsa safety composite

ISS Facility Services, Hewlett Packard Tulsa scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 16%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

25/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 7.38 per 100 workers

Safer than 16% of industry peers

DART rate
F 5.07 per 100 workers

Safer than 17% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−4.6

2016→2017

ISS Facility Services, Hewlett Packard Tulsa injury rate improved

ISS Facility Services, Hewlett Packard Tulsa's TCR fell 4.6 from 9.7 in 2016 to 5.1 in 2017. Peak filing year was 2016 at 9.7 TCR. In 2017, DART was 0.69× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=9.7 · 2017=5.1

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 561720 · Tulsa, OK ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 7.4 · 164% of ind

  • DART 5.1 DART
  • RANK #49/64
  • PHOTO Belmont Behavioral H…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 5 inj
  • SIZE ~35 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Belmont Behavioral Hospital (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Oklahoma employers → · Look up another →

ISS Facility Services, Hewlett Packard Tulsa in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows ISS Facility Services, Hewlett Packard Tulsa averages 7.4 TCR (164% of the Building cleaning services, janitorial BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

ISS Facility Services, Hewlett Packard Tulsa TCR series: 2016=9.7 · 2017=5.1 · BLS 4.5

Where ISS Facility Services, Hewlett Packard Tulsa falls in its industry

4,064 Building cleaning services, ja establishments

Safer than 16% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Oklahoma alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #49 safest of 64 Building cleaning services, ja employers in Oklahoma.

ISS Facility Services, Hewlett Packard Tulsa (35 employees, TCR 7.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 3.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate ISS Facility Services, Hewlett Packard Tulsa
ISS Facility Services, Hewlett Packard Tulsa (35 employees, TCR 7.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 3.2

ISS Facility Services, Hewlett Packard Tulsa has fewer employees than the Building cleaning services, janitorial median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2017 5.1 5.1 2 0 0
2016 9.7 9.7 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

561720 · OK · Tulsa

4,064 Building cleaning services, janitorial employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 5,320 rated employers in Oklahoma with headcount on file · 1,004 employers in Tulsa, OK · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Belmont Behavioral Hospital 7.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR SODEXO AT NIXA R-II SCHOOL DISTRICT 7.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Bella Casa Service Management, LLC 7.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Buttweiler Environmental, Inc. Corporate Office 7.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Buffalo Feeders, LLC 35 FTE
STATE-SIZE Miller Pecan Company 35 FTE
STATE-SIZE Southwestern 35 FTE
STATE-SIZE Riverside 35 FTE
CITY-NEAR Saint Francis Hospital, Inc. 6,668 FTE
CITY-NEAR H&P IDC - U.S. Land 6,014 FTE
CITY-NEAR TUL-TULSA-MAINTENANCE BASE 5,184 FTE
CITY-NEAR 4795-AA-TUL-TULSA-TUL-TRML 4,794 FTE
NAT-TCR Alliance Industries - Marinette 7.4 TCR
NAT-TCR NAPP Timber & Lumber 7.4 TCR
NAT-TCR 483 ABC Supply Co., Inc 7.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Iberia Extended Care Hospital 7.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE 3620 Sws of Ga-Brunswick 35 FTE
NAT-SIZE Fairfield Inn & Suites 35 FTE
NAT-SIZE Holiday Inn Harborview 35 FTE
NAT-SIZE House of Color, Inc. 35 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.