Die-cut paper products (except for office use) made from purchased paper or paperboard · Michigan

ITB Packaging

Holland, MI · ~39 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
8.6
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

ITB Packaging runs at 260% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Die-cut paper products (except for office use) made from purchased paper or paperboard workplace, earning a grade F.

ITB Packaging: 8.6 TCR = 260% of Die-cut paper products (except for office use) made from purchased paper or paperboard BLS 3.3 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

ITB Packaging safety composite

ITB Packaging scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 2%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

16/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 8.58 per 100 workers

Safer than 6% of industry peers

DART rate
F 11.18 per 100 workers

Safer than 2% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

ITB Packaging held a steady TCR band

ITB Packaging's TCR held near 0.3 from 10.9 in 2016 to 11.2 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2019 at 14.8 TCR. In 2024, DART was 1.3× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=10.9 · 2017=2.3 · 2018=11.7 · 2019=14.8 · 2020=7.3 · 2021=1.9 · 2024=11.2

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 322299 · Holland, MI ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 8.6 · 260% of ind

  • DART 11.2 DART
  • RANK #7/7
  • PHOTO Pap-R Products (Casey)
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 22 inj
  • SIZE ~39 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Pap-R Products (Casey) (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

ITB Packaging in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows ITB Packaging averages 8.6 TCR (260% of the Die-cut paper products (except for office use) made from purchased paper or paperboard BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

ITB Packaging TCR series: 2016=10.9 · 2017=2.3 · 2018=11.7 · 2019=14.8 · 2020=7.3 · 2021=1.9 · 2024=11.2 · BLS 3.3

Where ITB Packaging falls in its industry

236 Die-cut paper products (except establishments

Safer than 6% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #7 safest of 7 Die-cut paper products (except employers in Michigan.

ITB Packaging (39 employees, TCR 8.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 62 employees and a TCR of 3.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate ITB Packaging
ITB Packaging (39 employees, TCR 8.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 62 employees and a TCR of 3.2

ITB Packaging has fewer employees than the Die-cut paper products (except for offic median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 11.2 11.2 3 0 0
2021 1.9 0.0 1 0 0
2020 7.3 5.5 4 0 0
2019 14.8 2.5 6 0 0
2018 11.7 8.7 4 0 0
2017 2.3 2.3 1 0 0
2016 10.9 10.9 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

322299 · MI · Holland

236 Die-cut paper products (except for office use) made from purchased paper or paperboard employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 299 employers in Holland, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Pap-R Products (Casey) 8.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Axxor NA 8.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Pellet America Corporation Appleton 8.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Converted Products Inc. 8.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Mount Hope Dairy 39 FTE
STATE-SIZE CFI - Livonia 39 FTE
STATE-SIZE Dart Facilities 39 FTE
STATE-SIZE Cripps Fontaine Excavating, INC 39 FTE
CITY-NEAR LG Energy Solutions - Holland 1,263 FTE
CITY-NEAR Haworth HQ 1,165 FTE
CITY-NEAR Haworth Office 1,075 FTE
CITY-NEAR PADNOS 912 FTE
NAT-TCR Sign Specialists Corporation 8.6 TCR
NAT-TCR S.L. Contracting, Inc. 8.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Chatuge Regional Nursing Home 8.6 TCR
NAT-TCR LaGrange Grocery Company 8.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE APCO Electric 39 FTE
NAT-SIZE Brandywine Valley Concrete Construction, Ltd. 39 FTE
NAT-SIZE 950 Apollo Rd Eagan MN 39 FTE
NAT-SIZE American House - Bristol 39 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.