Electrical signs manufacturing · California

Sign Specialists Corporation

Santa Ana, CA · ~41 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
8.6
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Sign Specialists Corporation runs at 260% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Electrical signs manufacturing workplace, earning a grade F.

Sign Specialists Corporation: 8.6 TCR = 260% of Electrical signs manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Sign Specialists Corporation safety composite

Sign Specialists Corporation scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 5%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

17/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 8.58 per 100 workers

Safer than 8% of industry peers

DART rate
F 8.19 per 100 workers

Safer than 5% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Sign Specialists Corporation held a steady TCR band

Sign Specialists Corporation's TCR held near 0.3 from 7.9 in 2017 to 8.2 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 15.5 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.95× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=7.9 · 2018=9.5 · 2019=7.8 · 2020=15.5 · 2021=2.7 · 2024=8.2

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 339950 · Santa Ana, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 8.6 · 260% of ind

  • DART 8.2 DART
  • RANK #23/26
  • PHOTO DaVinci Sign Systems…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 18 inj
  • SIZE ~41 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: DaVinci Sign Systems, Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Sign Specialists Corporation in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Sign Specialists Corporation averages 8.6 TCR (260% of the Electrical signs manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Sign Specialists Corporation TCR series: 2017=7.9 · 2018=9.5 · 2019=7.8 · 2020=15.5 · 2021=2.7 · 2024=8.2 · BLS 3.3

Where Sign Specialists Corporation falls in its industry

405 Electrical signs manufacturing establishments

Safer than 8% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #23 safest of 26 Electrical signs manufacturing employers in California.

Sign Specialists Corporation (41 employees, TCR 8.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 53 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Sign Specialists Corporation
Sign Specialists Corporation (41 employees, TCR 8.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 53 employees and a TCR of 3.5

Sign Specialists Corporation has fewer employees than the Electrical signs manufacturing median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 8.2 8.2 3 0 0
2021 2.7 2.7 1 0 0
2020 15.5 15.5 3 3 0
2019 7.8 7.8 3 0 0
2018 9.5 7.1 4 0 0
2017 7.9 5.9 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

339950 · CA · Santa Ana

405 Electrical signs manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 492 employers in Santa Ana, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR DaVinci Sign Systems, Inc. 8.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR YESCO LLC - Phoenix, AZ Establishment 8.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Shamrock Building Services, Inc. 8.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR National Sign Berlin 8.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE CAL-O ORGANIC FARMING ADMINISTRATION 41 FTE
STATE-SIZE Sun Pacific Farming | Citrus Farming | Lindsay 41 FTE
STATE-SIZE Sun Pacific Farming | Citrus Farming | IEW Enterprise 41 FTE
STATE-SIZE George Jackson Farms, Inc. 41 FTE
CITY-NEAR Think Together 2,496 FTE
CITY-NEAR City of Santa Ana 1,472 FTE
CITY-NEAR Orange County/Los Angeles 1,072 FTE
CITY-NEAR 056937-SANTA ANA CA P&DC 920 FTE
NAT-TCR ITB Packaging 8.6 TCR
NAT-TCR S.L. Contracting, Inc. 8.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Chatuge Regional Nursing Home 8.6 TCR
NAT-TCR LaGrange Grocery Company 8.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE 203 Moonachie Rd Moonachie NJ 41 FTE
NAT-SIZE 6120 Churchman Bypass Indianapolis IN 41 FTE
NAT-SIZE Luther Recon Center 41 FTE
NAT-SIZE Five Star Residences of Banta Pointe 41 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.