Agricultural machinery and equipment repair and maintenance services · Texas

ITS ConGlobal Houston LaPorte

Laporte, TX · ~51 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
3.7
Avg TCR
2.1
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

ITS ConGlobal Houston LaPorte runs at 177% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Agricultural machinery and equipment repair and maintenance services workplace, earning a grade D.

ITS ConGlobal Houston LaPorte: 3.7 TCR = 177% of Agricultural machinery and equipment repair and maintenance services BLS 2.1 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

ITS ConGlobal Houston LaPorte safety composite

ITS ConGlobal Houston LaPorte scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 76% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 35%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

53/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 3.71 per 100 workers

Safer than 35% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 76% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−5.2

2018→2021

ITS ConGlobal Houston LaPorte injury rate improved

ITS ConGlobal Houston LaPorte's TCR fell 5.2 from 5.2 in 2018 to 0.0 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2019 at 5.8 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=5.2 · 2019=5.8 · 2020=3.9 · 2021=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 811310 · Laporte, TX ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 3.7 · 177% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #211/292
  • PHOTO C222 Dublin LOC
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 7 inj
  • SIZE ~51 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: C222 Dublin LOC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

ITS ConGlobal Houston LaPorte in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows ITS ConGlobal Houston LaPorte averages 3.7 TCR (177% of the Agricultural machinery and equipment repair and maintenance services BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

ITS ConGlobal Houston LaPorte TCR series: 2018=5.2 · 2019=5.8 · 2020=3.9 · 2021=0 · BLS 2.1

Where ITS ConGlobal Houston LaPorte falls in its industry

2,560 Agricultural machinery and equ establishments

Safer than 35% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #211 safest of 292 Agricultural machinery and equ employers in Texas.

ITS ConGlobal Houston LaPorte (51 employees, TCR 3.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 2.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate ITS ConGlobal Houston LaPorte
ITS ConGlobal Houston LaPorte (51 employees, TCR 3.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 2.7

ITS ConGlobal Houston LaPorte has more employees than the Agricultural machinery and equipment rep median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 3.9 3.9 2 0 0
2019 5.8 5.8 2 0 0
2018 5.2 1.7 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

811310 · TX · Laporte

2,560 Agricultural machinery and equipment repair and maintenance services employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 62 employers in Laporte, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR C222 Dublin LOC 3.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Tulsa Location 984 3.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Comm HVAC NA and EMEA : SVC-Carolina District : SVC-GreenvilleSC-USA 3.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Integrated Power Services Denver Moline Service Center 3.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Moore County Gin 51 FTE
STATE-SIZE Goldsmith 51 FTE
STATE-SIZE Titan Directional Drilling 51 FTE
STATE-SIZE Coastal Flow Liquid Measurement, Inc. 51 FTE
CITY-NEAR Contech Control Services, Inc. 964 FTE
CITY-NEAR Home Office 507 FTE
CITY-NEAR BrandSafway, LLC - Houston - Laporte Branch 337 FTE
CITY-NEAR Dragon Products LaPorte 210 FTE
NAT-TCR Tecta America East LLC - Baltimore 3.7 TCR
NAT-TCR South Brunswick Schoo* 3.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Arizona Veterans Home 3.7 TCR
NAT-TCR CMS 3.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Alameda 51 FTE
NAT-SIZE MAC Thin Films Inc. 51 FTE
NAT-SIZE Calif Maritime Acad * 51 FTE
NAT-SIZE Unk Market @ 27th 51 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.