Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · California

Ivy Park at Mission Viejo

Mission Viejo, CA · ~91 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
12.4
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Ivy Park at Mission Viejo runs at 328% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Ivy Park at Mission Viejo: 12.4 TCR = 328% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Ivy Park at Mission Viejo safety composite

Ivy Park at Mission Viejo scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 20%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

29/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 12.45 per 100 workers

Safer than 20% of industry peers

DART rate
F 7.18 per 100 workers

Safer than 25% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Ivy Park at Mission Viejo: 0.0 → 22.7 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 22.7 TCR · DART/TCR 0.58× in 2024

Ivy Park at Mission Viejo's TCR rose 22.7 from 0.0 in 2022 to 22.7 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 0.58× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Mission Viejo, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 12.4 · 328% of ind

  • DART 7.2 DART
  • RANK #449/635
  • PHOTO Isle at Watercrest M…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 30 inj
  • SIZE ~91 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Isle at Watercrest Mansfield (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Ivy Park at Mission Viejo in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Ivy Park at Mission Viejo averages 12.4 TCR (328% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Ivy Park at Mission Viejo TCR series: 2022=0 · 2023=14.6 · 2024=22.7 · BLS 3.8

Where Ivy Park at Mission Viejo falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 20% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #449 safest of 635 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in California.

Ivy Park at Mission Viejo (91 employees, TCR 12.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Ivy Park at Mission Viejo
Ivy Park at Mission Viejo (91 employees, TCR 12.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Ivy Park at Mission Viejo has more employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 22.7 7.2 19 0 0
2023 14.6 7.3 11 1 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · CA · Mission Viejo

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 77 employers in Mission Viejo, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Isle at Watercrest Mansfield 12.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Amber Glen Alzheimer's Special Care Center 12.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Appleton Retirement LLC dba Primrose of Appleton 12.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Gracemont Assisted Living and Memory Care 12.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE CDK Agriculture, Inc. 91 FTE
STATE-SIZE Belridge 91 FTE
STATE-SIZE Micro Paradox 91 FTE
STATE-SIZE CFS, LP. 91 FTE
CITY-NEAR CA822 MISSION HOSPITAL MISSION VIEJO HR 2,178 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - DCX2 347 FTE
CITY-NEAR South Coast Community Services 340 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mission Viejo 526 298 FTE
NAT-TCR City of Kalamazoo-Public Services- Stockbridge 12.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Holden Elementary School 12.4 TCR
NAT-TCR TNN014 12.4 TCR
NAT-TCR COD034 12.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Stonewall Logistics 91 FTE
NAT-SIZE Tri-County Community Corrections 91 FTE
NAT-SIZE LPFP Crest Foam 91 FTE
NAT-SIZE Greif (MG AUSTELL-2) 91 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.