Homes for the elderly without nursing care · Georgia

Gracemont Assisted Living and Memory Care

Cumming, GA · ~52 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
12.5
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Gracemont Assisted Living and Memory Care runs at 328% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Homes for the elderly without nursing care workplace, earning a grade F.

Gracemont Assisted Living and Memory Care: 12.5 TCR = 328% of Homes for the elderly without nursing care BLS 3.8 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Gracemont Assisted Living and Memory Care safety composite

Gracemont Assisted Living and Memory Care scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 16%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

26/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 12.46 per 100 workers

Safer than 20% of industry peers

DART rate
F 9.51 per 100 workers

Safer than 16% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−5.9

2019→2020

Gracemont Assisted Living and Memory Care injury rate improved

Gracemont Assisted Living and Memory Care's TCR fell 5.9 from 15.4 in 2019 to 9.5 in 2020. Peak filing year was 2019 at 15.4 TCR. In 2020, DART was 0.76× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2019=15.4 · 2020=9.5

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Cumming, GA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 12.5 · 328% of ind

  • DART 9.5 DART
  • RANK #162/205
  • PHOTO FB-HHH1-SPRING ARBOR…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 9 inj
  • SIZE ~52 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: FB-HHH1-SPRING ARBOR FREDERICKSBU (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Georgia employers → · Look up another →

Gracemont Assisted Living and Memory Care in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Gracemont Assisted Living and Memory Care averages 12.5 TCR (328% of the Homes for the elderly without nursing care BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Gracemont Assisted Living and Memory Care TCR series: 2019=15.4 · 2020=9.5 · BLS 3.8

Where Gracemont Assisted Living and Memory Care falls in its industry

6,510 Homes for the elderly without establishments

Safer than 20% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Georgia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #162 safest of 205 Homes for the elderly without employers in Georgia.

Gracemont Assisted Living and Memory Care (52 employees, TCR 12.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Gracemont Assisted Living and Memory Care
Gracemont Assisted Living and Memory Care (52 employees, TCR 12.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Gracemont Assisted Living and Memory Care has more employees than the Homes for the elderly without nursing ca median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 9.5 9.5 1 3 0
2019 15.4 9.6 8 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · GA · Cumming

6,510 Homes for the elderly without nursing care employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 14,941 rated employers in Georgia with headcount on file · 139 employers in Cumming, GA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR FB-HHH1-SPRING ARBOR FREDERICKSBU 12.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Cornerstone at Milford 12.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Forest Heights Senior Living Community 12.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Aegis Living Lake Union 12.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Cleveland Hatchery (CV) 52 FTE
STATE-SIZE Transmission Support PC Field Services Maintenance Reliability 160 Lake Mirror Road Forest Park 52 FTE
STATE-SIZE Statesboro Operating - 111 Stockyard Rd. 52 FTE
STATE-SIZE D.R. Horton Realty of Georgia - Atlanta East - Atlanta Realty 52 FTE
CITY-NEAR Northside Forsyth 4,043 FTE
CITY-NEAR Northside Hospital Forsyth 3,354 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cumming Plant 1,173 FTE
CITY-NEAR Koch Foods-Cumming 1,138 FTE
NAT-TCR Holy Cross Health Center 12.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Encompass Health Rehabilitation Hospital of Rock Hill 12.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Ross store 294 12.5 TCR
NAT-TCR United Producers, Inc. - Bucyrus 12.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Herbert S. Hiller, a division of The Hiller Companies, Inc. 52 FTE
NAT-SIZE Wfl Sarasota 52 FTE
NAT-SIZE Yucaipa 52 FTE
NAT-SIZE Michigan Cat Saginaw 52 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.